Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30735492›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Comparing the performance of urine and copro-antigen detection in evaluating Opisthorchis viverrini infection in communities with different transmission levels in Northeast Thailand.

Chanika Worasith, Chompunoot Wangboon, Kunyarat Duenngai, Nadda Kiatsopit, Kulthida Kopolrat, Anchalee Techasen, Jiraporn Sithithaworn, Narong Khuntikeo, Watcharin Loilome, Nisana Namwat and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Liver Flukes: Clonorchis and Opisthorchis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Performance of Mini ParasepParasites & vectors · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chanika WorasithDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Chompunoot WangboonCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Kunyarat DuenngaiDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Science and Technology, Phetchabun Rajabhat University, Phetchabun, Thailand.
Nadda KiatsopitDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Kulthida KopolratDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Anchalee TechasenCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Jiraporn SithithawornFaculty of Medicine, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham, Thailand.
Narong KhuntikeoCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Watcharin LoilomeCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Nisana NamwatCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Puangrat YongvanitCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Elizabeth J CarltonDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Anschutz, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Paiboon SithithawornDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9480-1778
Khon Kaen University · THColorado School of Public Health · USMahasarakham University · THPhetchabun Rajabhat University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To combat and eventually eliminate the transmission of the liver fluke Opisthorchis viverrini, an accurate and practical diagnostic test is required. A recently established urine antigen detection test using monoclonal antibody-based enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (mAb-ELISA) has shown promise due to its high diagnostic accuracy and the use of urine in place of fecal samples. To further test the utility of this urine assay, we performed a cross sectional study of 1,043 people in 3 opisthorchiasis endemic communities in northeast Thailand by applying urine antigen detection together with copro-antigen detection methods. The quantitative formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) was concurrently performed as a reference method. The prevalence of O. viverrini determined by urine antigen detection correlated well with that by copro-antigen detection and both methods showed 10-15% higher prevalence than FECT. Within the fecal negative cases by FECT, 29% and 43% were positive by urine and copro-antigen detection, respectively. The prevalence and intensity profiles determined by antigen detection and FECT showed similar patterns of increasing trends of infection with age. The concentration of antigen measured in urine showed a positive relationship with the concentration of copro-antigen, both of which were positively correlated with fecal egg counts. The data observed in this study indicate that urine antigen detection had high diagnostic accuracy and was in concordance with copro-antigen detection. Due to the ease and noninvasiveness of sample collection, the urine assay has high potential for clinical diagnosis as well as population screening in the program for the control and elimination of opisthorchiasis.

Indexed as

OpisthorchisAdultAgedAnimalsAntigens, HelminthCross-Sectional StudiesFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpisthorchiasisThailandAntigens, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID30735492
PMCPMC6383950
OpenAlexW2912836442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.