Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30735474›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019

Attributes influencing parental decision-making to receive the Tdap vaccine to reduce the risk of pertussis transmission to their newborn - outcome of a cross-sectional conjoint experiment in Spain and Italy.

Edouard Ledent, Giovanni Gabutti, Esther W de Bekker-Grob, Juan Luis Alcázar Zambrano, Magda Campins Martí, María Teresa Del Hierro Gurruchaga, María José Fernández Cruz, Giuseppe Ferrera, Francesca Fortunato, Pierfederico Torchio and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01890447 (Assessing Contacts' Decision Making on Reducing the Risk of Pertussis Transmission to Newborns Through Immunisation, in Italy and Spain), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01890447 completednot on this map

Assessing Contacts' Decision Making on Reducing the Risk of Pertussis Transmission to Newborns Through Immunisation, in Italy and Spain

TypeobservationalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2015 to 2016Enrolled676ConditionsPertussisArmsWeb-based survey questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Attribute nonattendance in COVID-19 vaccine choice: A discrete choice experiment based on Chinese public preference.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Edouard Ledenta Statistical Solutions & Innovations , GSK , Rixensart , Belgium.
Giovanni Gabuttib Department of Medical Sciences , University of Ferrara , Ferrara , Italy.
Esther W de Bekker-Grobc Section Health Technology Assessment and Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre , Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam , The Netherlands.
Juan Luis Alcázar Zambranod Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Clínica Universitad de Navarra , Pamplona , Spain.
Magda Campins Martíe Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Epidemiología , Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron , Barcelona , Spain.
María Teresa Del Hierro Gurruchagaf Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería , Universidad del País Vasco , Leioa , Spain.
María José Fernández Cruzg Hospital Universitario de Getafe , Getafe , Spain.
Giuseppe Ferrerai Dipartimento Medico di Prevenzione-Servizio Epidemiologia , ASP Ragusa, Centro Servizi , Ragusa , Italy.
Francesca Fortunatoj Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences , University of Foggia , Foggia , Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0665-5385
Pierfederico Torchiok Servizio Igiene e Sanità Pubblica , Cuneo , Italy.
Giorgio Zoppil Dipartimento di Prevenzione , Struttura Complessa Igiene e Sanità Pubblica , Chiavari , Regione Liguria , Italy.
Christian Agbotonm Medical Affairs , GSK , Wavre , Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1178-2429
Walid Kandeiln Global Medical Affairs , GSK , Wavre , Belgium.
Federico Marchettio Direzione Medica Vaccini , GSK , Verona , Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6435-8990
GlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BEClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESErasmus University Rotterdam · NLHospital Universitario de Getafe · ESRegione del Veneto · ITStatistics Belgium · BEUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of the Basque Country · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pertussis vaccination of parents and household contacts ('cocooning') to protect newborn infants is an established strategy in many countries, although uptake may be low. Many aspects may influence such decision-making. We conducted a cross-sectional survey (NCT01890447) of households and other close contacts of newborns aged ≤6 months (or of expectant mothers in their last trimester) in Spain and Italy, using an adaptive discrete-choice experiment questionnaire. Aims were to assess the relative importance of attributes influencing vaccine adoption, and to estimate variation in vaccine adoption rates and the impact of cost on vaccination rates. Six hundred and fifteen participants (Spain, n = 313; Italy, n = 302) completed the survey. Of 144 available questionnaire scenarios, the most frequently selected (14% of respondents in both countries) were infant protection by household vaccination at vaccination center, recommendation by family physician and health authorities, with information available on leaflets and websites. The attribute with highest median relative importance was 'reduction in source of infection' in Spain (23.1%) and 'vaccination location' in Italy (18.8%). Differences between other attributes were low in both countries, with media attributes showing low importance. Over 80% of respondents indicated a definite or probable response to vaccine adoption (at no-cost) with estimated probability of adoption of 89-98%; applying vaccine costs (25€ per person) would reduce the probability of uptake by 7-20% in definite/probable respondents. Awareness of these determinants is helpful in informing Health Authorities and healthcare practitioners implementing a cocooning strategy for those populations where maternal immunization is not a preferred option.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornItalyMaleMiddle AgedParentsSpainVaccinationWhooping CoughDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccinesadaptive choice-based conjoint questionnaireadaptive discrete-choice experimentcocooningItalyPertussispreferencesSawtooth softwareSpainsurveyvaccination

Identifiers

PMID30735474
PMCPMC6605846
OpenAlexW2914617675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.