Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30735174›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2019

Genetic Engineering of Dictyostelium discoideum Cells Based on Selection and Growth on Bacteria.

Peggy Paschke, David A Knecht, Thomas D Williams, Peter A Thomason, Robert H Insall, Jonathan R Chubb, Robert R Kay, Douwe M Veltman

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Discovery of anti-infective compounds againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Function of small GTPases in Dictyostelium macropinocytosis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peggy PaschkeMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology; ppaschke@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.
David A KnechtDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut.
Thomas D WilliamsMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology.
Peter A ThomasonCancer Research UK Beatson Institute Glasgow.
Robert H InsallCancer Research UK Beatson Institute Glasgow.
Jonathan R ChubbMRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London; Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London.
Robert R KayMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology.
Douwe M VeltmanMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K009699/1Cancer Research UK 15672Cancer Research UK 24450Cancer Research UK A15672Medical Research Council MC_U105115237Medical Research Council MC_U12266BWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 202867/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dictyostelium discoideum is an intriguing model organism for the study of cell differentiation processes during development, cell signaling, and other important cellular biology questions. The technologies available to genetically manipulate Dictyostelium cells are well-developed. Transfections can be performed using different selectable markers and marker re-cycling, including homologous recombination and insertional mutagenesis. This is supported by a well-annotated genome. However, these approaches are optimized for axenic cell lines growing in liquid cultures and are difficult to apply to non-axenic wild-type cells, which feed only on bacteria. The mutations that are present in axenic strains disturb Ras signaling, causing excessive macropinocytosis required for feeding, and impair cell migration, which confounds the interpretation of signal transduction and chemotaxis experiments in those strains. Earlier attempts to genetically manipulate non-axenic cells have lacked efficiency and required complex experimental procedures. We have developed a simple transfection protocol that, for the first time, overcomes these limitations. Those series of large improvements to Dictyostelium molecular genetics allow wild-type cells to be manipulated as easily as standard laboratory strains. In addition to the advantages for studying uncorrupted signaling and motility processes, mutants that disrupt macropinocytosis-based growth can now be readily isolated. Furthermore, the entire transfection workflow is greatly accelerated, with recombinant cells that can be generated in days rather than weeks. Another advantage is that molecular genetics can further be performed with freshly isolated wild-type Dictyostelium samples from the environment. This can help to extend the scope of approaches used in these research areas.

Indexed as

ChemotaxisBacteriaDictyosteliumGenetic EngineeringHomologous RecombinationMutagenesis, InsertionalMutationPinocytosisSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID30735174
PMCPMC7039707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.