Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30734890›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2019

Comparative performance of screening instruments for obstructive sleep apnea in morbidly obese patients referred to a sleep laboratory: a prospective cross-sectional study.

Ricardo L M Duarte, Fernanda C Q Mello, Flavio J Magalhães-da-Silveira, Tiago S Oliveira-E-Sá, Marcelo F Rabahi, David Gozal

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ricardo L M DuarteSleep - Laboratório de Estudo dos Distúrbios do Sono, Centro Médico BarraShopping, Avenida das Américas 4666, sala 309, Barra da Tijuca, Rio de Janeiro, 22649-900, Brazil. rlmduarte@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2611-4001
Fernanda C Q MelloInstituto de Doenças do Tórax - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Flavio J Magalhães-da-SilveiraSleep - Laboratório de Estudo dos Distúrbios do Sono, Centro Médico BarraShopping, Avenida das Américas 4666, sala 309, Barra da Tijuca, Rio de Janeiro, 22649-900, Brazil.
Tiago S Oliveira-E-SáHospital de Santa Marta - Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Marcelo F RabahiFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiás, Brazil.
David GozalDepartment of Child Health, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is very common occurrence among morbidly obese patients. Our main objectives were to validate the No-Apnea, a 2-item screening tool, in morbidly obese patients and compare its performance with three other instruments: STOP-Bang questionnaire, NoSAS score, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS).

methodsA cross-sectional analysis of morbidly obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35.0 kg/m

resultsA total of 1017 subjects (40.4% in BS cohort and 59.6% in NBS cohort) were evaluated. In the BS cohort, No-Apnea had similar discrimination to STOP-Bang and NoSAS for predicting OSA

conclusionsNo-Apnea is a useful and practical tool for screening of OSA in morbidly obese patients, with non-inferior performance to STOP-Bang questionnaire and NoSAS score.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningPolysomnographyAdultBariatric SurgeryCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationSleep Apnea, ObstructiveSurveys and QuestionnairesObesityObstructive sleep apneaPolysomnographyScreening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.