Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30734849›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Machine learning identifies "rsfMRI epilepsy networks" in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Rose Dawn Bharath, Rajanikant Panda, Jeetu Raj, Sujas Bhardwaj, Sanjib Sinha, Ganne Chaitanya, Kenchaiah Raghavendra, Ravindranadh C Mundlamuri, Arivazhagan Arimappamagan, Malla Bhaskara Rao and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Machine learning techniques based onFrontiers in neurology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Rose Dawn BharathNeuroimaging and Interventional Radiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560029, India.
Rajanikant PandaNeuroimaging and Interventional Radiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560029, India.
Jeetu RajDepartment of Computer Science, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, 110016, India.
Sujas BhardwajNeuroimaging and Interventional Radiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560029, India.
Sanjib SinhaNeurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560029, India.
Ganne ChaitanyaNeurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560029, India.
Kenchaiah RaghavendraNeurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560029, India.
Ravindranadh C MundlamuriNeurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560029, India.
Arivazhagan ArimappamaganNeurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560029, India.
Malla Bhaskara RaoNeurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560029, India.
Jamuna RajeshwaranNeuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560029, India.
Kandavel ThennarasuBiostatistics, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560029, India.
Kaushik K MajumdarSystems Science and Informatics Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560059, India.
Parthasarthy SatishchandraNeurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560029, India.
Tapan K GandhiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, (IIT-D), New Delhi, Delhi, 110016, India. cns.researchers1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7693-8095
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences · INIndian Institute of Technology Delhi · INIndian Statistical Institute · INThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesExperimental models have provided compelling evidence for the existence of neural networks in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). To identify and validate the possible existence of resting-state "epilepsy networks," we used machine learning methods on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) data from 42 individuals with TLE.

methodsProbabilistic independent component analysis (PICA) was applied to rsfMRI data from 132 subjects (42 TLE patients + 90 healthy controls) and 88 independent components (ICs) were obtained following standard procedures. Elastic net-selected features were used as inputs to support vector machine (SVM). The strengths of the top 10 networks were correlated with clinical features to obtain "rsfMRI epilepsy networks."

resultsSVM could classify individuals with epilepsy with 97.5% accuracy (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 94.4%). Ten networks with the highest ranking were found in the frontal, perisylvian, cingulo-insular, posterior-quadrant, thalamic, cerebello-thalamic, and temporo-thalamic regions. The posterior-quadrant, cerebello-thalamic, thalamic, medial-visual, and perisylvian networks revealed significant correlation (r > 0.40) with age at onset of seizures, the frequency of seizures, duration of illness, and a number of anti-epileptic drugs.

conclusionsIC-derived rsfMRI networks contain epilepsy-related networks and machine learning methods are useful in identifying these networks in vivo. Increased network strength with disease progression in these "rsfMRI epilepsy networks" could reflect epileptogenesis in TLE. KEY POINTS: • ICA of resting-state fMRI carries disease-specific information about epilepsy. • Machine learning can classify these components with 97.5% accuracy. • "Subject-specific epilepsy networks" could quantify "epileptogenesis" in vivo.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultCerebellumElectroencephalographyEpilepsy, Temporal LobeFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleThalamusYoung AdultMagnetic resonance imagingSeizuresSupport vector machineTemporal lobe epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID30734849
OpenAlexW2914229793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.