Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30734832›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of frailty & aging

Can a Prebiotic Formulation Reduce Frailty Levels in Older People?

O Theou, K Jayanama, J Fernández-Garrido, C Buigues, L Pruimboom, A J Hoogland, R Navarro-Martínez, K Rockwood, O Cauli

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of frailty & aging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Orthopedic Surgery-a Narrative Review.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Can Leucine Supplementation Improve Frailty Index Scores?Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

O TheouOlga Theou, Rm 1313, Veterans' Memorial Building, 5955 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H2E1, Canada. Email: olga.theou@dal.ca, Tel: +1 (902) 473-4846, Fax: +1 (902) 473-1050.
K Jayanama
J Fernández-Garrido
C Buigues
L Pruimboom
A J Hoogland
R Navarro-Martínez
K Rockwood
O Cauli
Universitat de València · ESDalhousie University · CARamathibodi Hospital · THUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine whether a prebiotic formulation reduces frailty index (FI) levels in older people.

designWe conducted secondary analysis of a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind design study. SETTING/

participantsThe study included non-demented people over the age of 65 who were living in nursing homes and were able to walk. Fifty participants completed the study (75.3±7.3 years, 70% females).

interventionParticipants were randomly assigned to either a group who received daily Darmocare Pre® (inulin and fructooligosaccharides) for 13 weeks or a placebo group (maltodextrin). MEASUREMENT: The primary outcome in this secondary analysis was change in level of a 62-item FI compared to baseline.

resultsAt the 13-week follow-up, the placebo group had higher FI levels (preFI 0.23±0.11, postFI 0.24±0.12, p=0.012) and the intervention group had lower FI levels (preFI 0.22±0.09, postFI 0.20±0.08, p<0.001). There was an average increase of 0.01±0.01 in the FI score in the placebo group (0.4 deficits; Cohen's d 0.61; standardized response mean 0.59) and an average reduction of 0.02±0.02 in the intervention group (1.1 deficits; Cohen's d -1.35; standardized response mean -1.16). Among the 28 participants in the intervention group, FI levels were reduced for 25 people; five of them had an FI reduction greater than 0.03. The moderately/severely frail participants (FI >0.3, N=5) had the greatest reduction in their FI (0.04±0.01).

conclusionA prebiotic intervention can reduce frailty levels in nursing home residents especially in those with higher levels of frailty.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyHumansInulinMaleOligosaccharidesPrebioticsTreatment OutcomefructooligosaccharideInulinOligosaccharidesPrebioticsFrailty indexgut microbiotanursing homeprebioticsrandomized clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID30734832
PMCPMC12275644
OpenAlexW2910448916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.