Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30734604›Full record

ArticleJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry2019

Targeting Loxosceles spider Sphingomyelinase D with small-molecule inhibitors as a potential therapeutic approach for loxoscelism.

Priscila Hess Lopes, Mário T Murakami, Fernanda C V Portaro, Kerly Fernanda Mesquita Pasqualoto, Carmen van den Berg, Denise V Tambourgi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Spider venom phospholipase D toxin structure: Interfacial binding site, mechanism, activation, and head group preference.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spider bites of medical significance in the Mediterranean area: misdiagnosis, clinical features and management.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Sphingomyelinases D FromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Priscila Hess Lopesa Immunochemistry Laboratory , Butantan Institute , São Paulo , SP , Brazil.
Mário T Murakamib Biosciences National Laboratory , National Centre for Research in Energy and Materials , Campinas , SP , Brazil.
Fernanda C V Portaroa Immunochemistry Laboratory , Butantan Institute , São Paulo , SP , Brazil.
Kerly Fernanda Mesquita Pasqualotoc Alchemy - Innovation, Research & Development Ltda., Center of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Technology (CIETEC) , University of São Paulo , SP , Brazil.
Carmen van den Bergd Centre for Medical Education , Cardiff University, School of Medicine , Cardiff , United Kingdom.
Denise V Tambourgia Immunochemistry Laboratory , Butantan Institute , São Paulo , SP , Brazil.
Instituto Butantan · BRBrazilian Biosciences National Laboratory · BRCardiff University · GBUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loxosceles spiders' venoms consist of a mixture of proteins, including the sphingomyelinases D (SMases D), which are the main toxic components responsible for local and systemic effects in human envenomation. Herein, based on the structural information of SMase D from Loxosceles laeta spider venom and virtual docking-based screening approach, three benzene sulphonate compounds (named 1, 5 and 6) were identified as potential Loxosceles SMase D inhibitors. All compounds inhibited the hydrolysis of the sphingomyelin substrate by both recombinant and native SMases D. Compounds 5 and 6 acted as SMases D uncompetitive inhibitors with Ki values of 0.49 µM and 0.59 µM, respectively. Compound 1 is a mixed type inhibitor, and presented a Ki value of 0.54 µM. In addition, the three compounds inhibited the binding of SMases D to human erythrocytes and the removal of glycophorin C from the cell surface, which are important events in the complement-dependent haemolysis induced by Loxosceles venom. Moreover, compounds 5 and 6 reduced the binding of SMases to human keratinocytes membrane and the venom induced cell death. Importantly, compounds 5 and 6 also controlled the development of the necrotic lesion in an in vivo model of loxoscelism. Together, our findings indicate that the novel SMase D inhibitors presented here are able to suppress both local and systemic reactions induced by Loxosceles venoms. Since the number of Loxosceles envenomation accidents is currently growing worldwide, our results indicate that both inhibitors are promising scaffolds for the rational design of new drugs targeting SMases D from these spiders.

Indexed as

AnimalsErythrocytesHumansMolecular StructurePhosphodiesterase InhibitorsPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesRabbitsSkin DiseasesSmall Molecule LibrariesSpider BitesSpidersPhosphodiesterase InhibitorsPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesSmall Molecule Librariessphingomyelin phosphodiesterase Dloxoscelismmolecular docking simulationsnovel sphingomyelinase D inhibitorsprotein-ligand binding affinityvenoms

Identifiers

PMID30734604
PMCPMC6327989
OpenAlexW2909937209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.