Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30734523›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2019

Bioturbation of peanut worms Sipunculus nudus on the composition of prokaryotic communities in a tidal flat as revealed by 16S rRNA gene sequences.

Junwei Li, Ruiping Hu, Yongjian Guo, Suwen Chen, Xiaoyong Xie, Jian G Qin, Zhenhua Ma, Changbo Zhu, Surui Pei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Junwei LiKey Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, PR China.
Ruiping HuGuangzhou Haiwei Aquatic Science and Technology Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, PR China.
Yongjian GuoKey Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, PR China.
Suwen ChenKey Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, PR China.
Xiaoyong XieKey Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, PR China.
Jian G QinCollege of Sciences and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Zhenhua MaKey Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, PR China.ORCID 0000-0003-3112-3153
Changbo ZhuKey Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Fishery Ecology and Environment, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, PR China.
Surui PeiAnnoroad Gene Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, PR China.
Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences · CNAnnoroad Gene Technology (China) · CNFlinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the impacts of peanut worms Sipunculus nudus on the prokaryotic community composition in a tidal flat, an onsite investigation was conducted in Suixi in the Beibu Gulf (109.82E, 21.35N) in the burrow sediments, non-burrow sediments and the sediments without peanut worm disturbance (control). The16S rRNA gene Illumina MiSeq sequencing was used to investigate the microbial communities and their response to bioturbation by S. nudus in a sandy tidal flat. A total of 18 bacteria phyla were detected, and Proteobacteria and Cyanobacteria constituted the majority of the prokaryotic community in the samples. The distribution of the relative abundances of genera showed that approximately 6.99%-17% of the reads in the samples were classified into 25 known genera. Sulfate-reducing bacteria (Desulfococcus and Desulfosarcina) were the most abundant taxa, followed by Thermodesulfovibrionaceae LCP-6, indicating that sulfate reduction is the main process in the sandy tidal flat. The abundances of Desulfococcus, LCP-6 and Cyanobacterium in the non-burrow sediment were greater than in the burrow sediment, suggesting that the anoxic condition is more suitable for Desulfococcus and LCP-6 when the activity of S. nudus is absent. The biomass of Cyanobacterium was decreased by the feeding bioturbation of S. nudus. Meanwhile, the relative abundance of the Bacteroidetes Luteimonas in the burrow sediments was significantly greater than in the non-burrow sediment, and there was a strong relationship between S. nudus bioturbation and increased in oxygen contents and oxidation-reduction potentials in the burrow sediment. The abundances of Desulfococcus and LCP-6 were greater in the middle layer (20-30 cm) than in the top layer in the non-burrow sediment. However, the middle and bottom layers (20-30, 30-40 cm) had higher abundances of these genera than did the upper layers (0-10, 10-20 cm) in the burrow sediments. The abundances of the Fusobacteria Propionigenium and the Spirochaetes Spirochaeta were greater in the middle and bottom layers (20-30 cm, 30-40 cm) than in the top layers (0-10, 10-20 cm) in the burrow sediment, but this phenomenon was not found in the non-burrow sediment. This study demonstrates that bioturbation by S. nudus plays an important role in reshaping the bacterial community composition in intertidal regions.

Indexed as

BiotaSoil MicrobiologyAnimalsArachisBacteriaCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalGenes, rRNAHelminthsPhylogenyPolychaetaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbacterial communityhigh-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencingsandy tidal flatSipunculus nudus Linnaeus

Identifiers

PMID30734523
PMCPMC6692553
OpenAlexW2912860969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.