ArticleMolecular biology reports2019
Validation of a one-step PCR assay for the molecular identification of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto G1-G3 genotype.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular characterization of Echinococcus species causing human cystic echinococcosis in Algeria: predominance of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2026Article
- Effective Laboratory Diagnosis of Parasitic Infections of the Gastrointestinal Tract: Where, When, How, and What Should We Look For?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Genetic Characterization ofDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The many faces of parasite calreticulin.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Cystic Echinococcosis: Clinical, Immunological, and Biomolecular Evaluation of Patients from Sardinia (Italy).Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The Italian National Reference Center for Echinococcosis (CeNRE, Sassari, Italy) set up a diagnostic protocol of "one-step-PCR" useful for the detection of E. granulosus sensu stricto (E.g.s.s.) and the identification of its genotype (G1-G3). The purpose of this work was to perform the validation of the "PCR E.g.s.s." method. The procedures were performed employing the criteria of the World Organization for Animal Health as well as of the Italian Accreditation Body (ACCREDIA) based on the Regulation UNI CEI EN ISO/IEC 17025. Positive DNA samples belonging to E. granulosus, E. ortleppi, E. multilocularis, E. canadensis species were used for the experiments. Analytical specificity evidenced primer pairs Cal (Calreticulin l gene of 1001 bp) with an specificity higher respect to Ef1 (Elongation-Factor 1 Alpha gene of 706 bp) and NAD (Dehydrogenase-subunit 1 gene of 219 bp). The analytical sensitivity presented the capability to detect a very low amount of parasite DNA corresponding to a concentration of 12.5 pg/µl; accuracy and precision related to the operator performance, along with repeatability and reproducibility, evidenced high concordance among results and demonstrated an excellent κ values of Cohen. According to the good performance related to the evaluated parameters, the method "PCR E.g.s.s." was suitable for the validation procedure, and consequently, to be undergone to the accreditation process. In conclusion, the results demonstrated an elevated robustness and reliable features of the "PCR E.g.s.s." able to perform a rapid diagnosis of E. granulosus in only "one step", hence, it is likely to avoid the sequencing step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.