Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30734120›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2019

Gene therapies in canine models for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Peter P Nghiem, Joe N Kornegay

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Canine Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neuromuscular Development and Disease: Learning FromFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Creation and characterization of an immortalized canine myoblast cell line: Myok9.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter P NghiemDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, 4458 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843-4458, USA. pnghiem@tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8796-8123
Joe N KornegayDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, 4458 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843-4458, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) must first be tested in animal models to determine proof-of-concept, efficacy, and importantly, safety. The murine and canine models for DMD are genetically homologous and most commonly used in pre-clinical testing. Although the mouse is a strong, proof-of-concept model, affected dogs show more analogous clinical and immunological disease progression compared to boys with DMD. As such, evaluating genetic therapies in the canine models may better predict response at the genetic, phenotypic, and immunological levels. We review the use of canine models for DMD and their benefits as it pertains to genetic therapy studies, including gene replacement, exon skipping, and gene editing.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsDogsDystrophinGene EditingGenetic TherapyHumansMaleMiceMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneDystrophin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.