ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2019
Pyogenic sacroiliitis in children: don't forget the very young.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multicenter Retrospective Study of Musculoskeletal Bacterial Infections of the Pelvis in Children and Factors Associated With the Formation of an Abscess.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2026Observational
- Clinical and imaging characteristics of 135 cases of infectious sacroiliitis: a retrospective cohort study in China.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Pictorial Review of Paediatric Limp.Pediatric reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pyogenic sacroiliitis (PS) is rare with less than 100 pediatric cases reported in the medical literature. To better characterize PS in the pediatric population, we investigated a series of children presenting with PS. Retrospective data analysis was done at an academic tertiary center between the years of 2000 and 2017. All hospitalized children ≤ 16 years of age with PS were evaluated. Of the 894 children hospitalized with osteoarticular infections, 18 were diagnosed with PS (2%) and are included in the review. Two clinically distinct groups were identified. PS in infants (n = 13, 72.2%, mean age 1.1 years) had an indolent course and a faster recovery without any bacterial source identified. In contrast, the group of older children (n = 5, 27.8%, mean age 11.6 years) had a more complicated course and a higher rate of identified bacterial infections.Conclusion: We describe an under-recognized entity of PS in infants with a mild clinical course and fast recovery that differ from the "classical" septic sacroiliitis. Infants with PS did not suffer from invasive complications, and pathogen characteristics of older children were not identified. Infants with fever, irritability, decreased range of motion in the pelvic area, and pain during diapering should alert the clinician to this diagnosis. What is Known: • Pediatric pyogenic sacroiliitis is an extremely rare condition usually caused by Staphylococcus aureus with highest incidence in adolescents. • The diagnosis of PS is challenging due to its rarity and difficulty in assessing the sacroiliac joint. What is New: • We describe an under-recognized entity of PS in infants with a mild clinical course, without invasive complications and with fast recovery that differ from "classical" septic sacroiliitis. • Infants with fever, irritability, decreased range of motion in the pelvic area and pain during diapering should raise clinical suspicion of this diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.