Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30734089›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2019

Personalised and progressive neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in patients with cancer-a clinical case series.

Dominic O'Connor, Matilde Mora Fernandez, Gabriel Signorelli, Pedro Valero, Brian Caulfield

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Plus Nutritional Counseling Attenuates Thigh Muscle Thickness Loss in Hospitalized Cancer Patients.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Self-directed home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in patients with advanced cancer and poor performance status: a feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dominic O'ConnorSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. dominic.oconnor@insight-centre.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3054-0636
Matilde Mora FernandezOncoavanze, Seville, Spain.
Gabriel SignorelliSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Pedro ValeroOncoavanze, Seville, Spain.
Brian CaulfieldSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IEUniversidad de Sevilla · ES

Funding

H2020 Marie Sk?odowska-Curie Actions 722012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be a pragmatic short-term alternative to voluntary exercise to augment cancer rehabilitation. However, previous attempts to use NMES as an exercise modality in this cohort have been unsuccessful, largely due to the use of NMES protocols that were developed for other rehabilitation contexts. We assessed the effects of a personalised and progressive NMES exercise intervention, designed with early-stage cancer rehabilitation in mind, on exercise capacity, lower body functional strength and quality of life in (QoL) in patients who are currently undergoing or have recently completed treatment for cancer.

methodsTen adult patients were recruited. A personalised and progressive NMES exercise intervention was implemented in each case over a 4-8-week period. The 30-s sit-to-stand test (STS), 6-min walk test (6MWT) and EORTC QLQ C-30 were performed pre- and post-intervention. Patients completed semi-structured interviews post-intervention to explore their experiences and views on the intervention and its impact on their daily lives.

resultsSix of the 10 recruited patients completed the intervention and completed pre-and post-assessments. Four of 6 patients improved STS, 5 of 6 patients improved 6MWT and 4 of 6 patients improved Global QoL. Perceived benefits included improved muscle strength and more confidence when walking.

conclusionA personalised and progressive NMES exercise intervention appears safe and may improve functional capacity and QoL in adults who are undergoing or have recently completed treatment for cancer. Replication of these results in a controlled prospective study is warranted prior to clinical implementation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCancer SurvivorsElectric StimulationElectric Stimulation TherapyExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMuscle StrengthNeoplasmsProspective StudiesQuadriceps MuscleQuality of LifeResearch DesignWalkingAdult cancer survivorsNeuromuscular electrical stimulationOncologyPhysical functionRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID30734089
OpenAlexW2912429770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.