Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30734078›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2019

[Metabolic surgery].

A T Billeter, B P Müller-Stich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A T BilleterKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
B P Müller-StichKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. beat.mueller@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Heidelberg · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years the surgical treatment of metabolic diseases has become established as an effective alternative to conservative treatment. The new S3 guidelines address these changes and give clear indications for obesity surgery. One of the core points of the new guidelines is the differentiation between obesity surgery and metabolic surgery. In obesity surgery the primary aim of treatment is weight loss whereas for metabolic indications the aim is an improvement of comorbidities independent of the body mass index (BMI). With respect to the selection of procedures sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and the traditional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) can be used as safe and evidence-based operative procedures. The RYGB has better metabolic effects but higher complication and reintervention rates. More recent procedures, such as the one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and single anastomosis duodeno-ileal (SADI) bypass possibly have slightly stronger metabolic effects, however, the risk of malnutrition and vitamin deficiency is higher.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastric BypassObesity, MorbidGastrectomyHumansWeight LossBariatric surgeryDiabetes mellitusMacrovascular complicationsMicrovascular complicationsNonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Identifiers

PMID30734078
OpenAlexW4251012395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.