Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30734077›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2019

A general framework for moment-based analysis of genetic data.

Maria Simonsen Speed, David Joseph Balding, Asger Hobolth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Simonsen SpeedBioinformatics Research Centre, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark. maria@birc.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-3356-2080
David Joseph BaldingMelbourne Integrative Genomics, School of BioSciences and School of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1480-6115
Asger HobolthBioinformatics Research Centre, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4056-1286

Funding

Det Frie Forskningsråd DFF 4002-00382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In population genetics, the Dirichlet (also called the Balding-Nichols) model has for 20 years been considered the key model to approximate the distribution of allele fractions within populations in a multi-allelic setting. It has often been noted that the Dirichlet assumption is approximate because positive correlations among alleles cannot be accommodated under the Dirichlet model. However, the validity of the Dirichlet distribution has never been systematically investigated in a general framework. This paper attempts to address this problem by providing a general overview of how allele fraction data under the most common multi-allelic mutational structures should be modeled. The Dirichlet and alternative models are investigated by simulating allele fractions from a diffusion approximation of the multi-allelic Wright-Fisher process with mutation, and applying a moment-based analysis method. The study shows that the optimal modeling strategy for the distribution of allele fractions depends on the specific mutation process. The Dirichlet model is only an exceptionally good approximation for the pure drift, Jukes-Cantor and parent-independent mutation processes with small mutation rates. Alternative models are required and proposed for the other mutation processes, such as a Beta-Dirichlet model for the infinite alleles mutation process, and a Hierarchical Beta model for the Kimura, Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano and Tamura-Nei processes. Finally, a novel Hierarchical Beta approximation is developed, a Pyramidal Hierarchical Beta model, for the generalized time-reversible and single-step mutation processes.

Indexed as

AllelesData AnalysisModels, GeneticComputer SimulationDatasets as TopicGenetics, PopulationHumansMutation RateAllele fractionBeta–DirichletDiffusionDirichletDistribution of allele fractionsEvolutionary historyHierarchical BetaMomentsMulti-allelic Wright–FisherMutation processesPyramid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.