Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30734062›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2020

No effect of graft size or body mass index on risk of revision after ACL reconstruction using hamstrings autograft.

Eivind Inderhaug, Jon Olav Drogset, Stein Håkon Låstad Lygre, Tone Gifstad

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Hamstring graft diameter above 7 mm has a lower risk of failure following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Posterior tibial slope (PTS) ≥ 10 degrees is a risk factor for further anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury; BMI is not.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Age, time from injury to surgery and quadriceps strength affect the risk of revision surgery after primary ACL reconstruction.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eivind InderhaugSurgical Department, Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Pb 6165, 5152, Bergen, Norway. eivind.inderhaug@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7959-163X
Jon Olav DrogsetTrondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Stein Håkon Låstad LygreHelse Bergen HF, Bergen, Norway.
Tone GifstadTrondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
St Olav's University Hospital · NODeaconess Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe current study investigated the distribution of hamstrings graft size and body mass index and any potential effect on the risk of revision surgery in a large prospective cohort of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. More specifically, the aim of the study was to investigate whether larger graft size or smaller BMI would decrease the risk of revision after ACL reconstruction.

methodsA total of 4029 patients, prospectively registered in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry, were included in the study. Univariate Kaplan-Meier survival analyses (with log-rank tests) and the Cox proportional hazard (PH) regression model were applied to compare risk of revision between groups of patients. Mutual adjustment for gender, age, activity at the time of injury and fixation method of the graft was performed.

resultsGraft sizes spanned from 5.5 to 11.0 mm and the median of 8.0 mm was reported in 42% of patients in the cohort. BMI was reported from 15 to 57 with a median of 25. 46% of patients were classified as overweight (WHO standards), while 23% of patients were obese. At a median of 2.5 years after surgery, 150 patients had undergone revision surgery. Although certain effects were seen in the unadjusted analyses, neither graft size (diameter) nor patient BMI did affect the risk of undergoing revision surgery in the adjusted analyses.

conclusionsGraft size and BMI was not found to be independent risk factors for undergoing ACL revision surgery. In contrast to other studies, graft size of 8 mm or larger did not have a better outcome than smaller graft sizes. A relatively large group of overweight patients undergoing ACL surgery reflects the general increase in weight seen in Western societies. Although the current study differs from previous findings, it might indicate that graft diameter is less important than previously stated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cohort study, II.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAdultAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAutograftsFemaleHamstring MusclesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleNorwayProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRegistriesReoperationRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID30734062
OpenAlexW2913281812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.