ArticleMethodsX2019
A low-cost quantitative continuous measurement of movements in the extremities of people with Parkinson's disease.
Article in MethodsX, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of virtual low-cost quantitative continuous measurement of movements in the extremities of people with Parkinson's disease.MethodsX · 2023Article
- A Deep Learning Approach for Automatic and Objective Grading of the Motor Impairment Severity in Parkinson's Disease for Use in Tele-Assessments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Dataset of quality assurance measurements of rhythmic movements.Data in brief · 2023Article
- Classification of extremity movements by visual observation of signals and their transforms.MethodsX · 2022Article
- Assistive Methodologies for Parkinson's Disease Tremor Management-A Health Opinion.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Cerebral Expression of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 5 in Idiopathic Autism Spectrum Disorder and Fragile X Syndrome: A Pilot Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- The role of lumateperone in the treatment of schizophrenia.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2021Review
- Article
- Reduced Expression of Cerebral Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 5 in Men with Fragile X Syndrome.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Dataset of quantitative structured office measurements of movements in the extremities.Data in brief · 2020Article
- An Expert System for Quantification of Bradykinesia Based on Wearable Inertial Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- A low-cost quantitative continuous measurement of movements in the extremities of people with Parkinson's disease.MethodsX · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The assessment of Parkinson's disease currently relies on the history of the present illness, the clinical interview, the physical examination, and structured instruments. Drawbacks to the use of clinical ratings include the reliance on real-time human vision to quantify small differences in motion and significant inter-rater variability due to inherent subjectivity in scoring the procedures. Rating tools are semi-quantitative by design, however, in addition to significant inter-rater variability, there is inherent subjectivity in administering these tools, which are not blinded in clinical settings. Sophisticated systems to quantify movements are too costly to be used by some providers with limited resources. A simple procedure is described to obtain continuous quantitative measurements of movements of people with Parkinson's disease for objective analysis and correlation with visual observation of the movements. •Inexpensive accelerometers are attached to the upper and lower extremities of patients with Parkinson's disease and related conditions to generate a continuous, three-dimensional recorded representation of movements occurring while performing tasks to characterize the deficits of Parkinson's disease.•Movements of the procedure are rated by trained examiners live in real-time and later by videotapes.•The output of the instrumentation can be conveyed to experts for interpretation for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.