ReviewPatient safety in surgery2019
Artificial intelligence systems for complex decision-making in acute care medicine: a review.
Review in Patient safety in surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of AI Scribes on Streamlining Clinical Documentation: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Empowering nurse leaders: readiness for AI integration and the perceived benefits of predictive analytics.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Predictive accuracy of machine learning models for conservative treatment failure in thoracolumbar burst fractures.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Biorobotic Drug Delivery for Biomedical Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Assessing the predictive capability of machine learning models in determining clinical outcomes for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated with laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion.Patient safety in surgery · 2024Article
- The value of machine learning technology and artificial intelligence to enhance patient safety in spine surgery: a review.Patient safety in surgery · 2024Review
- Advancing nursing practice with artificial intelligence: Enhancing preparedness for the future.Nursing open · 2024Article
- Intensive Care Unit Physicians' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Tools: Preimplementation Survey Study.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Immune moral models? Pro-social rule breaking as a moral enhancement approach for ethical AI.AI & society · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence and its impact on the domains of universal health coverage, health emergencies and health promotion: An overview of systematic reviews.International journal of medical informatics · 2022Review
- Predicting oxygen requirements in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 using an artificial intelligence-clinician model based on local non-image data.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Scoping Review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- How Clinicians Perceive Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Technologies in Diagnostic Decision Making: Mixed Methods Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Application Scenarios for Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care: Rapid Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Review
- Chest radiograph-based artificial intelligence predictive model for mortality in community-acquired pneumonia.BMJ open respiratory research · 2021Article
- Attitudes towards Trusting Artificial Intelligence Insights and Factors to Prevent the Passive Adherence of GPs: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Research perspectives on animal health in the era of artificial intelligence.Veterinary research · 2021Review
- Clinician involvement in research on machine learning-based predictive clinical decision support for the hospital setting: A scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Predicted Influences of Artificial Intelligence on the Domains of Nursing: Scoping Review.JMIR nursing · 2020Article
- Landscape of Machine Implemented Ethics.Science and engineering ethics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into acute care brings a new source of intellectual thought to the bedside. This offers great potential for synergy between AI systems and the human intellect already delivering care. This much needed help should be embraced, if proven effective. However, there is a risk that the present role of physicians and nurses as the primary arbiters of acute care in hospitals may be overtaken by computers. While many argue that this transition is inevitable, the process of developing a formal plan to prevent the need to pass control of patient care to computers should not be further delayed. The first step in the interdiction process is to recognize; the limitations of existing hospital protocols, why we need AI in acute care, and finally how the focus of medical decision making will change with the integration of AI based analysis. The second step is to develop a strategy for changing the focus of medical education to empower physicians to maintain oversight of AI. Physicians, nurses, and experts in the field of safe hospital communication must control the transition to AI integrated care because there is significant risk during the transition period and much of this risk is subtle, unique to the hospital environment, and outside the expertise of AI designers. AI is needed in acute care because AI detects complex relational time-series patterns within datasets and this level of analysis transcends conventional threshold based analysis applied in hospital protocols in use today. For this reason medical education will have to change to provide healthcare workers with the ability to understand and over-read relational time pattern centered communications from AI. Medical education will need to place less emphasis on threshold decision making and a greater focus on detection, analysis, and the pathophysiologic basis of relational time patterns. This should be an early part of a medical student's education because this is what their hospital companion (the AI) will be doing. Effective communication between human and artificial intelligence requires a common pattern centered knowledge base. Experts in safety focused human to human communication in hospitals should lead during this transition process.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.