Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30733809›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2019

Safety Evaluation of a New Traditional Chinese Medical Formula, Ciji-Hua'ai-Baosheng II Formula, in Adult Rodent Models.

Biqian Fu, Xiangyang Zhai, Shengyan Xi, Lifeng Yue, Yanan Wang, Yingkun Qiu, Yuewen Gong, Yangxinzi Xu, Linchao Qian, Jingru Huang and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Using Traditional Chinese Medicine to Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Targeting Tumor Immunity.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Biqian Fu *Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4626-8438
Xiangyang Zhai *Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6158-9822
Shengyan XiDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8315-6742
Lifeng YueDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China.
Yanan WangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0438-780X
Yingkun QiuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Yuewen GongCollege of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg R3E 0T5, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7929-1979
Yangxinzi XuDepartment of Physiology, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg R3E 3P4, Manitoba, Canada.
Linchao QianDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Jingru HuangCentral Laboratory, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Dawei LuDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Shuqiong HuangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Jing WangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Jing ZhouDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Di WuDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9944-3340
Yanhui WangDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Xiamen University · CNUniversity of Manitoba · CADongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCiji-Hua'ai-Baosheng II Formula (CHB-II-F) is a new traditional Chinese medical formula that has been shown to reduce toxicity and side effects of chemotherapy and increase the probability of cancer patient survival. Whether CHB-II-F is safe as an adjunctive therapy for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy has yet to be determined. PURPOSE: To evaluate the acute and subchronic toxic effects of CHB-II-F in rodent models.

methodsIn acute toxicity test, 24 Kunming mice were divided into 2 groups: untreated control and CHB-II-F 1.05 g/mL (31.44 g/kg) treated group. Treatment was administered to the treated group 3 times a day for 14 days. The overall health, adverse reactions, and mortality rate were documented. In subchronic toxicity test, 96 Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 4 groups: untreated control, high dose CHB-II-F (H) (26.20 g/kg), medium dose CHB-II-F (M) (13. 10 g/kg), and low dose CHB-II-F (L) (6.55 g/kg) [equal to 24.375 g (dried medicinal herb)/kg] treated groups. Treated groups were given the treatments once a day for 4 weeks. The overall health and mortality rate were recorded every day. Body weight and food consumption were measured once a week. Hematologic and biochemical parameters, organ weights, and histopathologic markers were analyzed after 4 weeks. An additional 2 weeks were given as the treatment recovery period before end-point euthanization, and biochemical analyses were performed.

resultsThe maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CHB-II-F on mice was found to be 94.31 g/kg [equal to 351 g (dried medicinal herb)/kg], which is 108 times the human adult dose. In the acute toxicity test, administration of CHB-II-F 31.44 g/kg showed no adverse effect and did not cause mortality. In the subchronic toxicity test, after 4 weeks of treatment, compared to the controls, total cholesterol (TCHO) level, cardiac and splenic indexes, body weights of female rats, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) in the CHB-II-F (H) group were significantly increased; triglyceride (TG) in the CHB-II-F (M) group and liver and splenic indexes in the CHB-II-F (L) group were increased. After the two-week recovery period, biofluid analyses, food consumption, and histopathologic examinations showed no abnormalities.

conclusionAdministration of CHB-II-F had no obvious adverse effect on the overall health of rodent models. A daily maximum dose of less than 94.31 g/kg or 6.55 g/kg CHB-II-F for 4 continuous weeks was considered safe.

Identifiers

PMID30733809
PMCPMC6348800
OpenAlexW2909189820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.