Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30733804›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2019

Indirect Restorations and Fixed Prosthodontics: Materials and Techniques Used by General Dentists of New Zealand.

Paul A Brunton, Jithendra Ratnayake, Carolina Loch, Arthi Veerasamy, Peter Cathro, Robert Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Functional Adhesives for a Restorative Future.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Studies on the use of glassionomer.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul A BruntonFaculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, 310 Great King Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
Jithendra RatnayakeFaculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, 310 Great King Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8534-4472
Carolina LochFaculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, 310 Great King Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
Arthi VeerasamyFaculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, 310 Great King Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
Peter CathroFaculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, 310 Great King Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
Robert LeeFaculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, 310 Great King Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate the selection and use of materials and techniques for core buildup, indirect restorations, and fixed prosthodontics by general dentists in New Zealand.

methodsA questionnaire comprising 19 sections and 125 questions was distributed via mail to 351 general dentists in New Zealand who were selected from the Dental Council of New Zealand's 2016 register.

resultsThe majority of the respondents (68.8%) reported using resin composite light-cured materials for the core buildup of vital posterior teeth. A large number of respondents (52%) did not use dentine pins, with the majority of them (25%) being recent graduates (<10 years). Fibre posts were used by 61.6% of the dentists surveyed. The majority of dentists (54.6%) reported using addition-cured silicone impression material for crown and bridge impressions. Glass-ionomer cements (37.5% of participants) and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (35.8%) were the most common luting cements used. Direct resin composite veneers were the preferred material of choice rather than indirect restoration of anterior teeth (40.4%).

conclusionsThe study showed that New Zealand dentists surveyed are using current state-of-the-art materials and techniques, with their choice of material being greatly influenced by clinical indications and patients aesthetic demands.

Identifiers

PMID30733804
PMCPMC6348825
OpenAlexW2911089159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.