Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30733796›Full record

ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2018

Bhramar Dutta, Aparna Banerjee, Priyanka Chakraborty, Rajib Bandopadhyay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. BioengineeringMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Discovery andACS omega · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bhramar DuttaUGC-Center of Advanced Study, Department of Botany, The University of Burdwan, Golapbag, Bardhaman 713104, West Bengal, India.
Aparna BanerjeeUGC-Center of Advanced Study, Department of Botany, The University of Burdwan, Golapbag, Bardhaman 713104, West Bengal, India.
Priyanka ChakrabortyUGC-Center of Advanced Study, Department of Botany, The University of Burdwan, Golapbag, Bardhaman 713104, West Bengal, India.
Rajib BandopadhyayUGC-Center of Advanced Study, Department of Botany, The University of Burdwan, Golapbag, Bardhaman 713104, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xylans are the second most abundant form of hemicelluloses and are the second most abundant polysaccharide in nature after cellulose. To degrade xylan, microbes produce mainly xylanase enzyme. Wide range of microorganisms like fungi, bacteria, yeast, marine algae etc. are capable of producing xylanase. Main source of xylanase is fungi but industrial production of bacterial xylanase is low cost, easy downstream process and high production rate. To understand primary, secondary and tertiary structure of xylanase,

Indexed as

Bacterial xylanasePhylogenetic relationshipsPhysical parametersStructural and functional analysis

Identifiers

PMID30733796
PMCPMC6353727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.