ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2018
PNME - A gene-gene parallel network module extraction method.
Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening key lncRNAs for human rectal adenocarcinoma based on lncRNA-mRNA functional synergistic network.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the domain of gene-gene network analysis, construction of co-expression networks and extraction of network modules have opened up enormous possibilities for exploring the role of genes in biological processes. Through such analysis, one can extract interesting behaviour of genes and would help in the discovery of genes participating in a common biological process. However, such network analysis methods in sequential processing mode often have been found time-consuming even for a moderately sized dataset. It is observed that most existing network construction techniques are capable of handling only positive correlations in gene-expression data whereas biologically-significant genes exhibit both positive and negative correlations. To address these problems, we propose a faster method for construction and analysis of gene-gene network and extraction of modules using a similarity measure which can identify both negatively and positively correlated co-expressed patterns. Our method utilizes General-purpose computing on graphics processing units (GPGPU) to provide fast, efficient and parallel extraction of biologically relevant network modules to support biomarker identification for breast cancer. The modules extracted are validated using p-value and q-value for both metastasis and non-metastasis stages of breast cancer. PNME has been found capable of identifying interesting biomarkers for this critical disease. We identified six genes with the interesting behaviours which have been found to cause breast cancer in homo-sapiens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.