Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30733691›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019

Design, Validation, and Reliability of an Observation Instrument for Technical and Tactical Actions of the Offense Phase in Soccer.

Enrique Ortega-Toro, Antonio García-Angulo, José María Giménez-Egido, Francisco Javier García-Angulo, José Manuel Palao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Design and Validation of the Instrument for the Measurement of Learning and Performance in Football.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Enrique Ortega-ToroDepartment of Physical Activity and Sport, Faculty of Sport Science, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Antonio García-AnguloDepartment of Physical Activity and Sport, Faculty of Sport Science, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
José María Giménez-EgidoDepartment of Physical Activity and Sport, Faculty of Sport Science, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Francisco Javier García-AnguloDepartment of Physical Activity and Sport, Faculty of Sport Science, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
José Manuel PalaoDepartment of Health, Exercise Science and Sport Management, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Kenosha, WI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of observational methodology in the sports context provides coaches and other sports professionals with flexible tools that adapt to their needs. In collective sports, the use of these instruments is common for the technical and tactical analysis of the game. Based on the importance of data quality in these instruments, the purpose was to design, validate, and test the reliability of a mixed observational instrument of field formats and category systems to analyze technical and tactical actions in the offense phase in soccer. The instrument collects information regarding the actions with the ball, moment of the play (start, development, and end), and contextual situation for the offensive team and for the goalkeeper. The instrument design, validation, and reliability calculation were done in four stages: (a) review of the literature, (b) design the first draft of the instrument, (c) experts' qualitative and quantitative review of the instrument, and (d) observer training test (reliability calculation). The content validity was established by 12 experts (Ph.D. in sports science or soccer coach with at least of 10 years of coaching experience). The Delphi methodology was used. Experts did a quantitative (scale 0-10) and qualitative evaluation. Experts were asked about: (a) comprehension of the criteria, categorical cores, degree of openness, and their definitions, (b) pertinence of categorical cores and degree of openness, and (c) whether to include other categorical cores or degree of openness in the observation instrument. The lowest Aiken's V index was 0.91 for the categorical core "

Indexed as

evaluationfootballmatch analysisobservational methodologyperformanceteam sport

Identifiers

PMID30733691
PMCPMC6353797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.