Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30733664›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

A Microglial Signature Directing Human Aging and Neurodegeneration-Related Gene Networks.

Shradha Mukherjee, Christine Klaus, Mihaela Pricop-Jeckstadt, Jeremy A Miller, Felix L Struebing

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Unraveling the enigma: housekeeping geneFrontiers in psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Shradha MukherjeeHealth Informatics Advanced Science Masters Program, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Christine KlausNeural Regeneration Group, Institute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Mihaela Pricop-JeckstadtInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine "Carl Gustav Carus", TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jeremy A MillerAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, United States.
Felix L StruebingDepartment of Translational Brain Research, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Munich, Germany.
Allen Institute · USArizona State University · USGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

VIsion Science Training in AtlantaT32EY007092 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Machelle T. Pardue · 1985 to 2026
$4.6M
NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging is regarded as a major risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases. Thus, a better understanding of the similarities between the aging process and neurodegenerative diseases at the cellular and molecular level may reveal better understanding of this detrimental relationship. In the present study, we mined publicly available gene expression datasets from healthy individuals and patients affected by neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and Huntington's disease) across a broad age spectrum and compared those with mouse aging and mouse cell-type specific gene expression profiles. We performed weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and found a gene network strongly related with both aging and neurodegenerative diseases. This network was significantly enriched with a microglial signature as imputed from cell type-specific sequencing data. Since mouse models are extensively used for the study of human diseases, we further compared these human gene regulatory networks with age-specific mouse brain transcriptomes. We discovered significantly preserved networks with both human aging and human disease and identified 17 shared genes in the top-ranked immune/microglia module, among which we found five human hub genes

Indexed as

agingAlzheimerbioinformaticsgene networksmicroglianeurodegenerationParkinsonWGCNA

Identifiers

PMID30733664
PMCPMC6353788
OpenAlexW2912697501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.