ArticleScientific reports2019
Optimal birth weight and term mortality risk differ among different ethnic groups in the U.S.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of Prenatal Exercise on Apgar Score and Health-Related Physical Fitness in Childhood: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of pregnancy · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of gestational age by pregnancy outcomes and distribution of pregnancy-related codes in Korean claims data.Epidemiology and health · 2026Article
- Current status of fertility rates and modes of delivery after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- US county-level prevalence and spatial distribution of optimal birth outcomes 2018-2019.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Birth Size and Maternal, Social, and Environmental Factors in the Province of Jujuy, Argentina.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among European countries, optimal birth weight at which the mortality is minimal is shown to be different by country. We investigated this difference examining one geopolitical population, the U.S. term live births, born to the five groups of the same ethnic parents; White, Black, Hispanic, North Asian, and South Asian. North Asians and South Asians had more favorable maternal factors for birth weight. Yet, Whites had the highest mean birth weight and South Asians, the lowest. However, neonatal mortality rate in Whites was 0.78 per 1,000 live births, significantly higher than 0.36 and 0.72 per 1,000 live births in North Asians and South Asians, respectively. Other maternal factors hardly explained this ethnic disparity in birth weight or mortality. Optimal birth weight was greatest in Whites (3,890 g), and least in South Asians (3,491 g). However, neonatal mortality at optimal birth weight was significantly lower in North Asians. Adjustment of maternal factors except parental ethnicity changed little of this difference. Optimal birth weight and its mortality differ by ethnicity. On planning the best birth outcome in a population, one should consider the variable mortality risks by ethnicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.