Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30733575›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord2019

An epidemiological study of traumatic spinal cord injuries in the fastest aging area in Japan.

Daisuke Kudo, Naohisa Miyakoshi, Michio Hongo, Yuji Kasukawa, Yoshinori Ishikawa, Noriyuki Ishikawa, Yoichi Shimada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daisuke KudoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan. dkudo@doc.med.akita-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8626-1057
Michio Hongo
Yoshinori Ishikawa
Noriyuki IshikawaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective epidemiological study.

objectiveTo investigate the epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in the fastest aging area in Japan.

settingHospitals in Akita Prefecture, Japan. Akita Prefecture has the highest ratio of people aged 65 or older in Japan (30.4% in 2012 and 34.6% in 2016).

methodsPatients with acute TSCI who required hospital treatment between 2012 and 2016 were included. The incidence of TSCI, cause, level, skeletal injury, and Frankel grade were investigated.

resultsThe mean annual incidence of TSCI excluding Frankel E was 86 per million (range 86-104 per million) during the 5-year study period, with a mean age of 65.9 years (male, 75.1%) and patients in their 60s as the largest age group. Cervical injury was seen in 89.8%, and cervical TSCI without skeletal injury was seen in 65.5%. Frankel D was the most common neurological deficit (53.5%). The most common cause was falls on level surfaces (32.1%), followed by low falls (21.6%) and road traffic accidents (15.6%).

conclusionsRecent incidence and characteristics of TSCI in the fastest aging society in Japan are presented. The incidence of incomplete cervical TSCI and falls on level surfaces appear to be increasing.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingCervical VertebraeChildFemaleHumansJapanLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSpinal Cord InjuriesThoracic Vertebrae

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.