ArticleScientific reports2019
Visual simulators replicate vision with multifocal lenses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictions of Through-Focus Performance of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses in Presbyopic Subjects Using a Visual Simulator.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Assessing Ocular Dominance: Rethinking the Current Paradigm.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2025Article
- Visual simulation of intraocular lenses: technologies and applications [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2025Review
- Perceptual cost and benefit of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: effect of energy balance, addition, and adaptation.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Non-contact lensless holographic reconstruction of diffractive intraocular lenses profiles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Differences in perceived chromatic aberration between emmetropic and myopic eyes using adaptive optics.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Visual Quality and Accommodation With Novel Optical Designs for Myopia Control.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Visual simulation of intraocular lenses: from on-bench performance to computational and experimental validations.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Simulation of daily soft multifocal contact lenses using SimVis Gekko: from in-vitro and computational characterization to clinical validation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Spatiotemporal defocus sensitivity function of the human visual system.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Experimental characterization, modelling and compensation of temperature effects in optotunable lenses.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Adaptive optics visual simulators: a review of recent optical designs and applications [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2022Review
- Multifocal contact lens vision simulated with a clinical binocular simulator.Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2022Article
- Accommodation through simulated multifocal optics.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Short-term delay in neural response with multifocal contact lens might start at the retinal level.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2022Article
- A Novel Intraocular Lens Simulator that Allows Patients to Experience the World Through Multifocal Intraocular Lenses Before Surgeries.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
- Matching convolved images to optically blurred images on the retina.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Article
- Optical and visual quality of real intraocular lenses physically projected on the patient's eye.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Vision with spatial light modulator simulating multifocal contact lenses in an adaptive optics system.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Adaptive optics (AO) visual simulators based on deformable mirrors, spatial light modulators or optotunable lenses are increasingly used to simulate vision through different multifocal lens designs. However, the correspondence of this simulation with that obtained through real intraocular lenses (IOLs) tested on the same eyes has not been, to our knowledge, demonstrated. We compare through-focus (TF) optical and visual quality produced by real multifocal IOLs (M-IOLs) -bifocal refractive and trifocal diffractive- projected on the subiect's eye with those same designs simulated with a spatial light modulator (SLM) or an optotunable lens working in temporal multiplexing mode (SimVis technology). Measurements were performed on 7 cyclopleged subjects using a custom-made multichannel 3-active-optical-elements polychromatic AO Visual Simulator in monochromatic light. The same system was used to demonstrate performance of the real IOLs, SLM and SimVis technology simulations on bench using double-pass imaging on an artificial eye. Results show a general good correspondence between the TF performance with the real and simulated M-IOLs, both optically (on bench) and visually (measured visual acuity in patients). We demonstrate that visual simulations in an AO environment capture to a large extent the individual optical and visual performance obtained with real M-IOLs, both in absolute values and in the shape of through-focus curves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.