Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30733494›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

In vitro culture with gemcitabine augments death receptor and NKG2D ligand expression on tumour cells.

Andrew M Gravett, Angus G Dalgleish, John Copier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. CD34Oncoimmunology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Entinostat/Syndax 275 in Osteosarcoma.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew M GravettOncology Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London, UK. agravett@sgul.ac.uk.
Angus G DalgleishOncology Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London, UK.
John CopierOncology Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London, UK.
St George's, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much effort has been made to try to understand the relationship between chemotherapeutic treatment of cancer and the immune system. Whereas much of that focus has been on the direct effect of chemotherapy drugs on immune cells and the release of antigens and danger signals by malignant cells killed by chemotherapy, the effect of chemotherapy on cells surviving treatment has often been overlooked. In the present study, tumour cell lines: A549 (lung), HCT116 (colon) and MCF-7 (breast), were treated with various concentrations of the chemotherapeutic drugs cyclophosphamide, gemcitabine (GEM) and oxaliplatin (OXP) for 24 hours in vitro. In line with other reports, GEM and OXP upregulated expression of the death receptor CD95 (fas) on live cells even at sub-cytotoxic concentrations. Further investigation revealed that the increase in CD95 in response to GEM sensitised the cells to fas ligand treatment, was associated with increased phosphorylation of stress activated protein kinase/c-Jun N-terminal kinase and that other death receptors and activatory immune receptors were co-ordinately upregulated with CD95 in certain cell lines. The upregulation of death receptors and NKG2D ligands together on cells after chemotherapy suggest that although the cells have survived preliminary treatment with chemotherapy they may now be more susceptible to immune cell-mediated challenge. This re-enforces the idea that chemotherapy-immunotherapy combinations may be useful clinically and has implications for the make-up and scheduling of such treatments.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalDeoxycytidinefas ReceptorGemcitabineGPI-Linked ProteinsHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa BSignal TransductionUp-RegulationAntineoplastic AgentsDeoxycytidinefas ReceptorGemcitabineGPI-Linked ProteinsHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMICB antigenProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa BTNFRSF11A protein, humanULBP2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID30733494
PMCPMC6367314
OpenAlexW2911813499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.