Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30733298›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Infiltration of CD8

Xuefei Li, Tina Gruosso, Dongmei Zuo, Atilla Omeroglu, Sarkis Meterissian, Marie-Christine Guiot, Adam Salazar, Morag Park, Herbert Levine

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xuefei LiCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77030.
Tina GruossoGoodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3250-1008
Dongmei ZuoGoodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada.
Atilla OmerogluDepartment of Pathology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
Sarkis MeterissianDepartment of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3T2, Canada.
Marie-Christine GuiotDepartment of Pathology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
Adam SalazarCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77030.
Morag ParkGoodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A3, Canada; herbert.levine@rice.edu morag.park@mcgill.ca.
Herbert LevineCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77030; herbert.levine@rice.edu morag.park@mcgill.ca.
McGill University Health Centre · CACenter for Theoretical Biological Physics · USMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CANortheastern University · US

Funding

Suppression of Mammary Tumorigenesis by Stromal p53P01CA097189 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FERNANDEZ, SOLEDAD A · 2004 to 2016
$16.1M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA097189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infiltration of [Formula: see text] T lymphocytes into solid tumors is associated with good prognosis in various types of cancer, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the mechanisms underlying different infiltration levels are largely unknown. Here, we have characterized the spatial profile of [Formula: see text] T cells around tumor cell clusters (tightly connected tumor cells) in the core and margin regions in TNBC patient samples. We found that in some patients, the [Formula: see text] T cell density first decreases when moving in from the boundary of the tumor cell clusters and then rises again when approaching the center. To explain various infiltration profiles, we modeled the dynamics of T cell density via partial differential equations. We spatially modulated the diffusion/chemotactic coefficients of T cells (to mimic physical barriers) or introduced the localized secretion of a diffusing T cell chemorepellent. Combining the spatial-profile analysis and the modeling led to support for the second idea; i.e., there exists a possible chemorepellent inside tumor cell clusters, which prevents [Formula: see text] T cells from infiltrating into tumor cell clusters. This conclusion was consistent with an investigation into the properties of collagen fibers which suggested that variations in desmoplastic elements does not limit infiltration of [Formula: see text] T lymphocytes, as we did not observe significant correlations between the level of T cell infiltration and fiber properties. Our work provides evidence that [Formula: see text] T cells can cross typical fibrotic barriers and thus their infiltration into tumor clusters is governed by other mechanisms possibly involving a local repellent.

Indexed as

AdultCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell CountCell Line, TumorCell MovementFemaleHumansLymphocyte CountLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMiddle AgedTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmschemokineECMTILTNBCtumor-cell clusters

Identifiers

PMID30733298
PMCPMC6397588
OpenAlexW2894609651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.