Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30733255›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2019

Improved Detection of Subtle Mesial Temporal Sclerosis: Validation of a Commercially Available Software for Automated Segmentation of Hippocampal Volume.

J M Mettenburg, B F Branstetter, C A Wiley, P Lee, R M Richardson

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Quantification of amyloid PET for future clinical use: a state-of-the-art review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J M MettenburgFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.M.M., B.F.B.,) mettenburgjm@upmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3049-6268
B F BranstetterFrom the Departments of Radiology (J.M.M., B.F.B.,).ORCID 0000-0002-8502-6909
C A WileyPathology (C.A.W.).ORCID 0000-0002-2697-7691
P LeeNeurosurgery (P.L., R.M.R.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-0573-0283
R M RichardsonNeurosurgery (P.L., R.M.R.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-2620-7387
B. J. Medical College & Sassoon Hospital · INUniversity of Pittsburgh · USAnna Needs Neuroblastoma Answers · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIdentification of mesial temporal sclerosis is critical in the evaluation of individuals with temporal lobe epilepsy. Our aim was to assess the performance of FDA-approved software measures of hippocampal volume to identify mesial temporal sclerosis in patients with medically refractory temporal lobe epilepsy compared with the initial clinical interpretation of a neuroradiologist. MATERIALS AND

methodsPreoperative MRIs of 75 consecutive patients who underwent a temporal resection for temporal lobe epilepsy from 2011 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed, and 71 were analyzed using Neuroreader, a commercially available automated segmentation and volumetric analysis package. Volume measures, including hippocampal volume as a percentage of total intracranial volume and the Neuroreader Index, were calculated. Radiologic interpretations of the MR imaging and pathology from subsequent resections were classified as either mesial temporal sclerosis or other, including normal findings. These measures of hippocampal volume were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curves on the basis of pathologic confirmation of mesial temporal sclerosis in the resected temporal lobe. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each method and compared by means of the McNemar test using the optimal threshold as determined by the Youden J point.

resultsOptimized thresholds of hippocampal percentage of a structural volume relative to total intracranial volume (<0.19%) and the Neuroreader Index (≤-3.8) were selected to optimize sensitivity and specificity (89%/71% and 89%/78%, respectively) for the identification of mesial temporal sclerosis in temporal lobe epilepsy compared with the initial clinical interpretation of the neuroradiologist (50% and 87%). Automated measures of hippocampal volume predicted mesial temporal sclerosis more accurately than radiologic interpretation (McNemar test,

conclusionsCommercially available automated segmentation and volume analysis of the hippocampus accurately identifies mesial temporal sclerosis and performs significantly better than the interpretation of the radiologist.

Indexed as

SoftwareAdultEpilepsy, Temporal LobeFemaleHippocampusHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSclerosisSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30733255
PMCPMC7028654
OpenAlexW2913890274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.