ArticleAnnals of emergency medicine2019
Emergency Department Environmental Contamination With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus After Care of Colonized Patients.
Article in Annals of emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial surface coating in the emergency department as protective technology for infection control (ASEPTIC): a pilot randomized controlled trial.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2024Trial
- Enablers of, and barriers to, optimal glove and mask use for routine care in the emergency department: an ethnographic study of Australian clinicians.Australasian emergency care · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectiveMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission dynamics in the emergency department (ED) are not well defined; environmental surfaces may serve as reservoirs for transmission. This study investigates the effect of patients with a history of MRSA colonization or infection on subsequent MRSA contamination of the ED environment.
methodsAdult ED patients with evidence of an MRSA-positive surveillance result or clinical microbiologic culture in the year preceding their current ED visit were enrolled. Cultures from 5 anatomic sites were obtained to detect active MRSA colonization. After patients' discharge and before environmental disinfection, up to 16 prespecified surfaces in their ED rooms were cultured. Strain typing was performed by repetitive-sequence polymerase chain reaction on all recovered MRSA isolates to determine concordance with the corresponding patient strain.
resultsOf 42 patients enrolled, 25 (60%) remained colonized with MRSA. Nineteen of the 25 ED rooms (76%) occupied by MRSA-colonized patients contained greater than or equal to 1 MRSA-contaminated environmental surface on patient discharge. Surfaces were more likely to be contaminated when rooms were occupied by patients colonized with MRSA at 1 body site (odds ratio 11.7; 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 91.5) and greater than or equal to 2 body sites (odds ratio 16.3; 95% confidence interval 3.1 to 86.8) compared with noncolonized patients. In 16 of the 19 ED rooms (84%) where MRSA was recovered, all environmental strains were concordant with the corresponding patient strain.
conclusionContamination of the ED environment with MRSA from actively colonized patients is common. Improved environmental surface disinfection may help reduce transmission of MRSA to ED health care professionals and patients during emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.