Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30732649›Full record

ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2019

Milk handling practices and consumption behavior among Borana pastoralists in southern Ethiopia.

Kebede Amenu, Barbara Wieland, Barbara Szonyi, Delia Grace

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Molecular detection and culture ofFrontiers in public health · 2026
    Article
  6. Antimicrobial resistance patterns ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The Global Prevalence ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kebede AmenuDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, P. O. Box 34, Bishoftu, Ethiopia. kamenu@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0985-2950
Barbara WielandInternational Livestock Research Institute, P. O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Barbara SzonyiInternational Livestock Research Institute, P. O. Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Delia GraceInternational Livestock Research Institute, P. O. Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya.
International Livestock Research Institute · KENational Veterinary Institute · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafety and wholesomeness of milk intended for human consumption are influenced by various interlinked factors. However, information on what these factors are, especially in the pastoral traditional communities of Ethiopia, is largely lacking. The objective of this study is to assess the hygienic milk production, processing and consumption practices, and behaviors of Borana pastoralists.

methodsThe study used qualitative participatory research methods. Individual semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, informal discussions, and observations were carried out on (1) milk handling practices, (2) perceptions of quality and safety of milk, including perceived criteria for good milk, (3) awareness of milk-borne diseases, and (4) perception towards milk boiling practices. The interviews and discussions were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by identifying themes.

resultsSome risky behaviors related to milk handling and consumption were identified. These include unhygienic conditions in handling milk and milk products, consumption behaviors such as consuming raw milk purchased from markets, and children directly consuming milk from the udder of animals (e.g., goats). There was a very strong reluctance to boil milk before consumption mainly because of the misconception that nutrients in the milk are destroyed when milk is boiled and "boiled milk is dead". On the other hand, potential risk mitigation practices were identified such as smoking of milk containers (which may help reduce microbial growth), processing milk through fermentation, consuming milk in boiled tea, and a recent trend towards boiling milk for babies. However, the latter was not motivated by concern over microbial hazards but the belief that raw milk could form curds in children's stomach which might then suffocate them.

conclusionThe findings highlight the need to promote hygienic handling practices of milk and closely engage with local communities to improve their understanding of milk safety to facilitate change in practices. Educating pastoralists on good milk production practices should be given priority. One of the ways to do this could be by strengthening the integration of milk hygiene in research and development programs as an entry point for behavioral change towards the safe handling and consumption of milk and milk products.

Indexed as

Food MicrobiologyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMilkAnimalsConsumer BehaviorDairyingEthiopiaFarmersFemaleFood ContaminationFood HandlingGoatsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleRisk-TakingDisease perceptionMilk boilingMilk consumptionMilk container smokingMilk hygieneSafe milk

Identifiers

PMID30732649
PMCPMC6367795
OpenAlexW2920902942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.