Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30732624›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

CARer-ADministration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for breakthrough symptoms in homebased dying patients (CARiAD): study protocol for a UK-based open randomised pilot trial.

Marlise Poolman, Jessica Roberts, Anthony Byrne, Paul Perkins, Zoe Hoare, Annmarie Nelson, Julia Hiscock, Dyfrig Hughes, Betty Foster, Julie O'Connor and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Marlise PoolmanBangor Institute for Health & Medical Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK. m.poolman@bangor.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2837-363X
Jessica RobertsBangor Institute for Health & Medical Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Anthony ByrneMarie Curie Research Centre, Cardiff University, Bangor, UK.
Paul PerkinsSue Ryder Leckhampton Court Hospice, Cheltenham, UK.
Zoe HoareBangor Institute for Health & Medical Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Annmarie NelsonMarie Curie Research Centre, Cardiff University, Bangor, UK.
Julia HiscockBangor Institute for Health & Medical Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Dyfrig HughesCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Betty FosterNorth Wales Cancer Network Patient Forum, Bangor, UK.
Julie O'ConnorSue Ryder Leckhampton Court Hospice, Cheltenham, UK.
Liz ReymondQueensland Health Metro South Hospital Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.
Sue HealyQueensland Health Metro South Hospital Health Service, Brisbane, Australia.
Rossela RobertsBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK.
Bee WeeUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Penney LewisThe Dickson Poon School of Law, King's College London, London, UK.
Rosalynde JohnstoneBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK.
Sian RobertsBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK.
Emily HolmesCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Stella WrightBangor Institute for Health & Medical Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Annie HendryBangor Institute for Health & Medical Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Clare WilkinsonBangor Institute for Health & Medical Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Bangor University · GBBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board · GBQueensland Health · AUCardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBMarie Curie · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Department of Health HTA/15/10/37Health Technology Assessment Programme 15/10/37Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile the majority of seriously ill people wish to die at home, only half achieve this. The likelihood of someone dying at home often depends on the availability of able and willing lay carers to support them. Dying people are usually unable to take oral medication. When top-up symptom relief medication is required, a clinician travels to the home to administer injectable medication, with attendant delays. The administration of subcutaneous injections by lay carers, though not widespread practice in the UK, has proven key in achieving home deaths in other countries. Our aim is to determine if carer-administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for four frequent breakthrough symptoms (pain, nausea, restlessness and noisy breathing) in home-based dying patients is feasible and acceptable in the UK.

methodsThis paper describes a randomised pilot trial across three UK sites, with an embedded qualitative study. Dyads of adult patients/carers are eligible, where patients are in the last weeks of life and wish to die at home, and lay carers who are willing to be trained to give subcutaneous medication. Dyads who do not meet strict risk assessment criteria (including known history of substance abuse or carer ability to be trained to competency) will not be approached. Carers in the intervention arm will receive a manualised training package delivered by their local nursing team. Dyads in the control arm will receive usual care. The main outcomes of interest are feasibility, acceptability, recruitment rates, attrition and selection of the most appropriate outcome measures. Interviews with carers and healthcare professionals will explore attitudes to, experiences of and preferences for giving subcutaneous medication and experience of trial processes. The study has obtained full ethical approval. DISCUSSION: This study will rehearse the procedures and logistics which will be undertaken in a future definitive randomised controlled trial and will inform the design of such a study. Findings will illuminate methodological and ethical issues pertaining to researching last days of life care. The study is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (Health Technology Assessment [HTA] project 15/10/37).

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN 11211024 . Registered on 27 September 2016.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesAnalgesicsAntiemeticsAttitude to DeathCaregiversDelivery of Health CareEducation, NonprofessionalFeasibility StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansHypnotics and SedativesInjections, SubcutaneousMulticenter Studies as TopicPalliative CarePilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesicsAntiemeticsHypnotics and SedativesCare of the dyingCarer administrationEnd-of-life carePalliative careRandomised pilot trialSymptom control

Identifiers

PMID30732624
PMCPMC6367805
OpenAlexW2915411032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.