Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30732571›Full record

ReviewBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

How diet, physical activity and psychosocial well-being interact in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: an integrative review.

Leah Gilbert, Justine Gross, Stefano Lanzi, Dan Yedu Quansah, Jardena Puder, Antje Horsch

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Leah GilbertObstetric service, Department Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. leah.gilbert@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0580-0141
Justine GrossObstetric service, Department Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stefano LanziObstetric service, Department Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Dan Yedu QuansahObstetric service, Department Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jardena PuderObstetric service, Department Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Antje HorschInstitute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), University of Lausanne, 1010, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHInstitute for Work and Health · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation SNF 32003B_176119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is associated with future cardio-metabolic risks for the mother and her child. In addition, one-third of women with recent GDM develop postpartum depression. Given these adverse impacts of GDM on the health of the mother and her offspring, it is important to intervene on modifiable factors, such as diet, physical activity, and psychosocial well-being. This integrative review therefore explored evidence on how these modifiable factors interact in women with GDM and their offspring, and how effective combined interventions are on reducing adverse impacts of GDM.

methodsA comprehensive search strategy included carefully selected terms that corresponded to the domains of interest (diet, physical activity and psychosocial well-being). The databases searched for articles published between 1980 and February 2018 were: CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Pubmed and Cochrane. Studies that were included in this review were either observational or intervention studies that included at least two domains of interest. Articles had to at least report data on maternal outcomes of women with GDM.

resultsThe search strategies identified 14'419 citations after excluding duplicates. After screening titles and then abstracts, 114 articles were selected for detailed evaluation of their full text, and 16 were included in this review: two observational and 14 intervention studies. Results from observational studies showed that psychosocial well-being (social support and self-efficacy) were positively associated with physical activity and dietary choice. Intervention studies always included diet and physical activity interventions, although none integrated psychosocial well-being in the intervention. These lifestyle interventions mostly led to increased physical activity, improved diet and lower stress perception. Many of these lifestyle interventions also reduced BMI and postpartum diabetes status, improved metabolic outcomes and reduced the risk of preterm deliveries and low birth weight.

conclusionThis integrative review showed that psychosocial well-being interacted with diet as well as with physical activity in women with GDM. We recommend that future studies consider integrating psychosocial well-being in their intervention, as observational studies demonstrated that social support and self-efficacy helped with adopting a healthy lifestyle following GDM diagnosis.

Indexed as

Self EfficacySocial SupportAdultDiabetes, GestationalDietExerciseFemaleHumansLife StylePostpartum PeriodPregnancyYoung AdultExerciseInterventionMental healthNutritionPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID30732571
PMCPMC6367798
OpenAlexW2915283579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.