Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30732566›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2019

Kaumātua Mana Motuhake: A study protocol for a peer education intervention to help Māori elders work through later-stage life transitions.

John G Oetzel, Brendan Hokowhitu, Mary Simpson, Rangimahora Reddy, Sophie Nock, Hineitimoana Greensill, Michael P Cameron, Pare Meha, Kirsten Johnston, Truely Harding and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

John G OetzelUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3188-776X
Brendan HokowhituUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand. brendan.hokowhitu@waikato.ac.nz.
Mary SimpsonUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Rangimahora ReddyRauawaawa Kaumātua Charitable Trust, 50 Colombo St, Hamilton, 3204, New Zealand.
Sophie NockUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Hineitimoana GreensillUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Michael P CameronUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Pare MehaRauawaawa Kaumātua Charitable Trust, 50 Colombo St, Hamilton, 3204, New Zealand.
Kirsten JohnstonRauawaawa Kaumātua Charitable Trust, 50 Colombo St, Hamilton, 3204, New Zealand.
Truely HardingUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Pita ShelfordUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Linda Tuhiwai SmithUniversity of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Aotearoa/New Zealand population is ageing and numerous studies demonstrate with this phenomenon comes increases in non-communicable diseases, injuries and healthcare costs among other issues. Further, significant inequities exist between Māori (Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa/New Zealand) and non-Māori around poor ageing and health. Most research addressing these issues is deficit oriented; however, the current research project takes a strengths-based approach that highlights the potential of kaumātua (elders) by asserting mana motuhake (autonomy, identity and self-actualisation). We believe that the esteem of elders in Māori culture signals transformative potential. Specifically, this project utilises a 'tuakana-teina' (older sibling/younger sibling) peer-educator model, where kaumātua work with other kaumātua in relation to health and wellbeing. The objectives of the project are (a) to develop the capacity of kaumātua as peer educators, whilst having positive impacts on their sense of purpose, health and wellbeing; and (b) to enhance the social and health outcomes for kaumātua receiving the intervention.

methodsThe research is grounded in principles of Kaupapa Māori and community-based participatory research, and brings together an Indigenous community of kaumātua, community health researchers, and academic researchers working with two advisory boards. The project intervention involves an orientation programme for tuakana peer educators for other kaumātua (teina). The research design is a pre- and post-test, clustered staggered design. All participants will complete a baseline assessment of health and wellbeing consistent with Māori worldviews (i.e., holistic model). The tuakana and teina participants will be divided into two groups with the first group completing the intervention during the first half of the project and the second group during the second half of the project. All participants will complete post-test assessments following both interventions allowing comparison of the two groups along with repeated measures over time. DISCUSSION: The findings will provide an evidence base for the importance and relevancy of kaumātua knowledge to create contextually based and culturally safe age-friendly environments that facilitate engagement and participation by kaumātua for kaumātua. If the model is effective, we will seek to facilitate the dissemination and scalability of the intervention.

trial registrationAustralia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ( ACTRN12617001396314 ); Date Registered: 3 October 2017 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Life Change EventsPeer GroupAgedAged, 80 and overCluster AnalysisFemaleHealth ServicesHumansMaleMedicine, TraditionalNew ZealandRegistriesRetrospective StudiesCommunity-based participatory researchMana motuhakePeer educationPositive ageingTuakana-teina

Identifiers

PMID30732566
PMCPMC6367813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.