Observational studyMedicine2019
Analyzing maternal mortality rate in rural China by Grey-Markov model.
Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in maternal and child health in China and its urban and rural areas from 1991 to 2020: a joinpoint regression model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Maternal mortality ratio in China from 1990 to 2019: trends, causes and correlations.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Prediction of water inflow from fault by particle swarm optimization-based modified grey models.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
- Comparing Regional Distribution Equity among Doctors in China before and after the 2009 Medical Reform Policy: A Data Analysis from 2002 to 2017.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- A Comparative Study on the Prediction of Occupational Diseases in China with Hybrid Algorithm Combing Models.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maternal mortality rate (MMR) in China has reduced during a decade but still higher than many countries around the world. Rural China is the key region which affects over all maternal death. This study aims to develop a suitable model in forecasting rural MMR and offer some suggestions for rural MMR intervention. Data in this study were collected through the Health Statistical Yearbook (2017) which included the overall MMR in China and urban and rural mortality rate. A basic grey model (GM(1,1)), 3 metabolic grey models (MGM), and a hybrid GM(1,1)-Markov model were presented to estimate rural MMR tendency. Average relative error (ARE), the post-test ratio (C), and small error probability (P) were adopted to evaluate models' fitting performance while forecasting effectiveness was compared by relative error.The MMR in rural China reduced obviously from 63.0 per 100,000 live births in 2005 to 21.1 per 100,000 live births in 2017. One basic GM(1,1) model was built to fit the rural MMR and the expression was X^((1)) (k + 1) = 553.80e^0.0947k - 550.00 (C = 0.0456, P > .99). Three MGM models expressions were X^((1)) (k + 1) = 548.67e^0.0923k - 503.17 (C = 0.0540, P > .99), X^((1)) (k + 1) = 449.39e^0.0887k - 408.09 (C = 0.0560, P > .99), X^((1)) (k + 1) = 461.33e^0.0893k - 425.23(C = 0.0660, P > .99). Hybrid GM(1,1)-Markov model showed the best fitting performance (C = 0.0804, P > .99). The relative errors of basic GM(1,1) model and hybrid model in fitting part were 2.42% and 2.03%, respectively, while 5.35% and 2.08%, respectively, in forecasting part. The average relative errors of MGM were 2.07% in fitting part and 17.37% in forecasting part.Data update was crucial in maintain model's effectiveness. The hybrid GM(1,1)-Markov model was better than basic GM(1,1) model in rural MMR prediction. It could be considered as a decision-making tool in rural MMR intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.