Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30730979›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

An algorithm applied to national surveillance data for the early detection of major dengue outbreaks in Cambodia.

Julia Ledien, Kimsan Souv, Rithea Leang, Rekol Huy, Anthony Cousien, Muslim Peas, Yves Froehlich, Raphaël Duboz, Sivuth Ong, Veasna Duong and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Julia LedienEpidemiology and Public Health Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.ORCID 0000-0002-6116-8371
Kimsan SouvEpidemiology and Public Health Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Rithea LeangCentre National de Malariologie (CNM), Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Rekol HuyCentre National de Malariologie (CNM), Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Anthony CousienEpidemiology and Public Health Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Muslim PeasEpidemiology and Public Health Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Yves FroehlichEpidemiology and Public Health Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Raphaël DubozEpidemiology and Public Health Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sivuth OngVirology Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Veasna DuongVirology Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Philippe BuchyGlaxoSmithKline, Vaccines R&D, Singapore, Singapore.
Philippe DussartVirology Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Arnaud TarantolaEpidemiology and Public Health Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue is a national priority disease in Cambodia. The Cambodian National Dengue Surveillance System is based on passive surveillance of dengue-like inpatients reported by public hospitals and on a sentinel, pediatric hospital-based active surveillance system. This system works well to assess trends but the sensitivity of the early warning and time-lag to usefully inform hospitals can be improved. During The ECOnomic development, ECOsystem MOdifications, and emerging infectious diseases Risk Evaluation (ECOMORE) project's knowledge translation platforms, Cambodian hospital staff requested an early warning tool to prepare for major outbreaks. Our objective was therefore to find adapted tools to improve the early warning system and preparedness. Dengue data was provided by the National Dengue Control Program (NDCP) and are routinely obtained through passive surveillance. The data were analyzed at the provincial level for eight Cambodian provinces during 2008-2015. The R surveillance package was used for the analysis. We evaluated the effectiveness of Bayesian algorithms to detect outbreaks using count data series, comparing the current count to an expected distribution obtained from observations of past years. The analyses bore on 78,759 patients with dengue-like syndromes. The algorithm maximizing sensitivity and specificity for the detection of major dengue outbreaks was selected in each province. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 73% and 97%, respectively, for the detection of significant outbreaks during 2008-2015. Depending on the province, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 50% to 100% and 75% to 100%, respectively. The final algorithm meets clinicians' and decisionmakers' needs, is cost-free and is easy to implement at the provincial level.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksAlgorithmsCambodiaDengueEarly DiagnosisGovernment ProgramsHumansPopulation SurveillanceSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID30730979
PMCPMC6366704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.