Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30730973›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The use of Barthel index for the assessment of the functional recovery after osteoporotic hip fracture: One year follow-up.

Ana P Mayoral, Elena Ibarz, Luis Gracia, Jesús Mateo, Antonio Herrera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quality of life and cost-utility analysis in patients with femoral neck fracture: a propensity score matching study comparing monopolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The effect of zoledronic acid and high-dose vitamin D on function after hip fractures. A prospective cohort study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Article
  17. Measuring functional outcomes in major trauma: can we do better?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana P MayoralHealth Sciences School, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Elena IbarzDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Luis GraciaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Jesús MateoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Antonio HerreraAragon Institute of Engineering Research, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7877-4733
Universidad de Zaragoza · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Barthel index evolution was analyzed in a sample of older people with osteoporotic hip fracture in order to verify the influence of comorbidities and cognitive impairment on the physical recovery of those patients, during the first year following the fracture. A prospective observational study was carried out between October 1, 2012 and March 31, 2013. A sample of 247 individuals was initially selected. After a primary revision, 39 participants were excluded (clearly not meeting inclusion criteria, lack of data, or not agree to participate in the study), and finally a total of 208 participants were included in the analysis, 166 women, with an average age of 84.59 years, and 42 men, with an average age of 82.05. 54.80% of all cases were older than 85 years. The mean Barthel index value prior to fracture was 76.63, decreasing to 64.91 at one-year follow-up. Only 22.12% of patients achieved a full recovery for activities of daily living. A statistical analysis was performed by comparing Barthel index recovery depending on the values of Charlson and Pfeiffer indexes, respectively. The mean differences in Barthel index drop between the one-year follow-up and the hospital admission values were found statistical significant (p<0.01). These findings indicate that Charlson and Pfeiffer indexes clearly influence the Barthel index recovery. Low values of Charlson and Pfeiffer indexes resulted in better Barthel index recovery. In conclusion, the Barthel index is a good tool to evaluate the physical recovery after osteoporotic hip fracture.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHip FracturesHumansMaleMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicOsteoporotic FracturesSpain

Identifiers

PMID30730973
PMCPMC6366714
OpenAlexW2913042349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.