ArticlePloS one2019
Factors associated with the choice of primary care facilities for initial treatment among rural and urban residents in Southwestern China.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Choice of primary healthcare providers among population in urban areas of low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of literature.BMC primary care · 2026Pooled it
- Value of an automated machine learning model with post-hoc explanation for predicting healthcare-seeking delays among residents in Tibetan regions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Why do they sign but not consult? A study on the effectiveness of China's family doctor contract services from the perspective of patient-doctor interaction.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Trends in antidiabetic drug use and expenditure in public hospitals in Northwest China, 2012-21: a case study of Gansu Province.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Analysis of Regional Differences, Dynamic Evolution, and Influencing Factors of Medical Service Levels in Guangzhou Under the Health China Strategy.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- Barriers to community healthcare delivery in urban China: a nurse perspective.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023Article
- Health service behaviors of migrants: A conceptual framework.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Trends and Patterns of Systemic Glucocorticoid Prescription in Primary Care Institutions in Southwest China, from 2018 to 2021.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
- Stated preferences for family doctor contract services: a survey of the rural elderly in Anhui Province, China.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Where does residents' choice of primary medical treatment come from?-A logical analysis based on the perspective of service accessibility and residents' cognition.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Review
- Community residents' preferences for chronic disease management in Primary Care Facilities in China: a stated preference survey.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2021Article
- COVID-19 Publications in Family Medicine Journals in 2020: A PubMed-Based Bibliometric Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Factors affecting health care users' first contact with primary health care facilities in north eastern China, 2008-2018.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Performance and Sociodemographic Determinants of Excess Outpatient Demand of Rural Residents in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Assessment of Bypass of the Nearest Primary Health Care Facility Among Women in Ghana.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Family medicine training in China: crisis and opportunity.Family medicine and community health · 2020Article
- Comparison of patient perceptions of primary care quality across healthcare facilities in Korea: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore influential factors contributing to the choice of primary care facilities (PCFs) for the initial treatment among rural and urban residents in Southwestern China.
methodsA face-to-face survey was conducted on a multistage stratified random sample of 456 rural and 459 urban residents in Sichuan Province from January to August in 2014. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data on residents' characteristics, provider of initial treatment and principal reason for the choice. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with choosing PCFs for the initial treatment.
resultsThe result showed that 65.4% of the rural residents and 50.5% of the urban residents chose PCFs as their initial contact for medical care. Among both rural and urban residents, the principal reason for choosing medical institutions for the initial treatment was convenience (42.3% versus 40.5%, respectively), followed by high quality of medical care (26.5% versus 29.4%, respectively). Compared to rural residents, urban residents were more likely to value trust in doctors and high quality of medical care but were less likely to value the insurance designation status of the facilities. Logistic regression analysis showed that both rural and urban residents were less likely to choose PCFs for the initial treatment if they lived more than 15 minutes (by walk) from the nearest facilities (rural: OR = 0.15, 95%CI = 0.09-0.26; urban: OR = 0.19, 95%CI = 0.10-0.36), had fair (rural: OR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.26-0.92; urban: OR = 0.31, 95%CI = 0.15-0.64) or poor (rural: OR = 0.14, 95%CI = 0.07-0.30; urban: OR = 0.22, 95%CI = 0.11-0.44) self-reported health status. Among rural residents, attending college or higher education (OR = 0.21, 95%CI = 0.08-0.59), being retired (OR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.44-1.84) and earning a per capita annual income of household of 10,000-29,999 (OR = 0.24, 95%CI = 0.11-0.52) and 30,000-49,999 (OR = 0.26, 95%CI = 0.07-0.92) were associated with lower rates of seeking care at PCFs.
conclusionEfforts should be made to improve the accessibility of PCFs and to upgrade the services capability of PCFs both in rural and urban areas in China. At the same time, resources should be prioritized to residents with poorer self-reported health status, and rural residents who retire or have better education and higher income levels should be taken into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.