Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30730967›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Factors associated with the choice of primary care facilities for initial treatment among rural and urban residents in Southwestern China.

Xiaxia Sun, Hongdao Meng, Zhiqiu Ye, Kyaien O Conner, Zhanqi Duan, Danping Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Barriers to community healthcare delivery in urban China: a nurse perspective.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. COVID-19 Publications in Family Medicine Journals in 2020: A PubMed-Based Bibliometric Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Family medicine training in China: crisis and opportunity.Family medicine and community health · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaxia SunDepartment of Health and Social Behavior, School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hongdao MengSchool of Aging Studies, College of Behavioral & Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.
Zhiqiu YeDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Kyaien O ConnerDepartment of Mental Health Law & Policy, College of Behavioral & Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.
Zhanqi DuanHealth and Family Planning Information Centre of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
Danping LiuDepartment of Health and Social Behavior, School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8017-7134

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore influential factors contributing to the choice of primary care facilities (PCFs) for the initial treatment among rural and urban residents in Southwestern China.

methodsA face-to-face survey was conducted on a multistage stratified random sample of 456 rural and 459 urban residents in Sichuan Province from January to August in 2014. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data on residents' characteristics, provider of initial treatment and principal reason for the choice. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with choosing PCFs for the initial treatment.

resultsThe result showed that 65.4% of the rural residents and 50.5% of the urban residents chose PCFs as their initial contact for medical care. Among both rural and urban residents, the principal reason for choosing medical institutions for the initial treatment was convenience (42.3% versus 40.5%, respectively), followed by high quality of medical care (26.5% versus 29.4%, respectively). Compared to rural residents, urban residents were more likely to value trust in doctors and high quality of medical care but were less likely to value the insurance designation status of the facilities. Logistic regression analysis showed that both rural and urban residents were less likely to choose PCFs for the initial treatment if they lived more than 15 minutes (by walk) from the nearest facilities (rural: OR = 0.15, 95%CI = 0.09-0.26; urban: OR = 0.19, 95%CI = 0.10-0.36), had fair (rural: OR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.26-0.92; urban: OR = 0.31, 95%CI = 0.15-0.64) or poor (rural: OR = 0.14, 95%CI = 0.07-0.30; urban: OR = 0.22, 95%CI = 0.11-0.44) self-reported health status. Among rural residents, attending college or higher education (OR = 0.21, 95%CI = 0.08-0.59), being retired (OR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.44-1.84) and earning a per capita annual income of household of 10,000-29,999 (OR = 0.24, 95%CI = 0.11-0.52) and 30,000-49,999 (OR = 0.26, 95%CI = 0.07-0.92) were associated with lower rates of seeking care at PCFs.

conclusionEfforts should be made to improve the accessibility of PCFs and to upgrade the services capability of PCFs both in rural and urban areas in China. At the same time, resources should be prioritized to residents with poorer self-reported health status, and rural residents who retire or have better education and higher income levels should be taken into account.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultAgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareRural Health ServicesSurveys and QuestionnairesUrban Health Services

Identifiers

PMID30730967
PMCPMC6366770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.