ArticlePloS one2019
Cost of implementing a community-based primary health care strengthening program: The case of the Ghana Essential Health Interventions Program in northern Ghana.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Equity effect of a community-based primary healthcare program on the incidence of childhood morbidity in rural Northern Ghana.Primary health care research & development · 2025Article
- Impact of a community-based primary healthcare programme on childhood diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DPT3) immunisation coverage in rural northern Ghana.Research in health services & regions · 2023Article
- Using health policy and systems research to influence national health policies: lessons from Mexico, Cambodia and Ghana.Health policy and planning · 2023Review
- Article
- Community perspectives on cardiovascular disease control in rural Ghana: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Is Infant birth weight and mothers perceived birth size associated with the practice of exclusive breastfeeding in Ghana?PloS one · 2022Article
- Closing the know-do gap for child health: UNICEF's experiences from embedding implementation research in child health and nutrition programming.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- Bugs in the Bed: Addressing the Contradictions of Embedded Science with Agile Implementation Research.Global health, science and practice · 2021Review
- Challenges and facilitators to the provision of sexual, reproductive health and rights services in Ghana.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2020Article
- Trends and risk factors associated with stillbirths: A case study of the Navrongo War Memorial Hospital in Northern Ghana.PloS one · 2020Article
- Unawareness of health insurance expiration status among women of reproductive age in Northern Ghana: implications for achieving universal health coverage.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2019Article
- Article
- Out-of-pocket payment for primary healthcare in the era of national health insurance: Evidence from northern Ghana.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe absence of implementation cost data constrains deliberations on consigning resources to community-based health programs. This paper analyses the cost of implementing strategies for accelerating the expansion of a community-based primary health care program in northern Ghana. Known as the Ghana Essential Health Intervention Program (GEHIP), the project was an embedded implementation science program implemented to provide practical guidance for accelerating the expansion of community-based primary health care and introducing improvements in the range of services community workers can provide.
methodsCost data were systematically collected from intervention and non-intervention districts throughout the implementation period (2012-2014) from a provider perspective. The step-down allocation approach to costing was used while WHO health system blocks were adopted as cost centers. We computed cost without annualizing capital cost to represent financial cost and cost with annualizing capital cost to represent economic cost.
resultsThe per capita financial cost and economic cost of implementing GEHIP over a three-year period was $1.79, and $1.07 respectively. GEHIP comprised only 3.1% of total primary health care cost. Health service delivery comprised the largest component of cost (37.6%), human resources was 28.6%, medicines was 13.6%, leadership/governance was 12.8%, while health information comprised 7.5% of the economic cost of implementing GEHIP.
conclusionThe per capita cost of implementing the GEHIP program was low. GEHIP project investments had a catalytic effect that improved community-based health planning and services (CHPS) coverage and enhanced the efficient use of routine health system resources rather than expanding overall primary health care costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.