Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30730961›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Cost of implementing a community-based primary health care strengthening program: The case of the Ghana Essential Health Interventions Program in northern Ghana.

Edmund Wedam Kanmiki, James Akazili, Ayaga A Bawah, James F Phillips, John Koku Awoonor-Williams, Patrick O Asuming, Abraham R Oduro, Moses Aikins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edmund Wedam KanmikiRegional Institute for Population Studies, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-7175-5222
James AkaziliNavrongo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Upper East Region, Ghana.
Ayaga A BawahRegional Institute for Population Studies, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
James F PhillipsDepartment of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
John Koku Awoonor-WilliamsPolicy, Planning, Monitoring, and Evaluation Division, Ghana Health Service Head Quarters, Accra, Ghana.
Patrick O AsumingUniversity of Ghana Business School, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Abraham R OduroNavrongo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Upper East Region, Ghana.
Moses AikinsSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe absence of implementation cost data constrains deliberations on consigning resources to community-based health programs. This paper analyses the cost of implementing strategies for accelerating the expansion of a community-based primary health care program in northern Ghana. Known as the Ghana Essential Health Intervention Program (GEHIP), the project was an embedded implementation science program implemented to provide practical guidance for accelerating the expansion of community-based primary health care and introducing improvements in the range of services community workers can provide.

methodsCost data were systematically collected from intervention and non-intervention districts throughout the implementation period (2012-2014) from a provider perspective. The step-down allocation approach to costing was used while WHO health system blocks were adopted as cost centers. We computed cost without annualizing capital cost to represent financial cost and cost with annualizing capital cost to represent economic cost.

resultsThe per capita financial cost and economic cost of implementing GEHIP over a three-year period was $1.79, and $1.07 respectively. GEHIP comprised only 3.1% of total primary health care cost. Health service delivery comprised the largest component of cost (37.6%), human resources was 28.6%, medicines was 13.6%, leadership/governance was 12.8%, while health information comprised 7.5% of the economic cost of implementing GEHIP.

conclusionThe per capita cost of implementing the GEHIP program was low. GEHIP project investments had a catalytic effect that improved community-based health planning and services (CHPS) coverage and enhanced the efficient use of routine health system resources rather than expanding overall primary health care costs.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesGhanaHealth Care CostsHumansNational Health ProgramsPrimary Health CareProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID30730961
PMCPMC6366692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.