Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30730881›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Knowledge, attitudes and practices with regard to schistosomiasis prevention and control: Two cross-sectional household surveys before and after a Community Dialogue intervention in Nampula province, Mozambique.

Christian Rassi, Sandrine Martin, Kirstie Graham, Monica Anna de Cola, Celine Christiansen-Jucht, Lauren E Smith, Ercílio Jive, Anna E Phillips, James N Newell, Marilia Massangaie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, and Fear of COVID-19: an Online-Based Cross-cultural Study.International journal of mental health and addiction · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christian RassiMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0402-2410
Sandrine MartinMalaria Consortium, Maputo, Mozambique.
Kirstie GrahamMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.
Monica Anna de ColaMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9444-8460
Celine Christiansen-JuchtMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.
Lauren E SmithMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6563-9273
Ercílio JiveDirecção Provincial de Saúde, Nampula, Mozambique.
Anna E PhillipsSchistosomiasis Control Initiative, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
James N NewellThe Nuffield Centre for International Health & Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Marilia MassangaieDepartamento das Doenças Tropicais Negligenciadas, Ministério de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Malaria Consortium · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Community Dialogue Approach is a promising social and behaviour change intervention, which has shown potential for improving health seeking behaviour. To test if this approach can strengthen prevention and control of schistosomiasis at community level, Malaria Consortium implemented a Community Dialogue intervention in four districts of Nampula province, Mozambique, between August 2014 and September 2015. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsCross-sectional household surveys were conducted before (N = 791) and after (N = 792) implementation of the intervention to assess its impact on knowledge, attitudes and practices at population level. At both baseline and endline, awareness of schistosomiasis was high at over 90%. After the intervention, respondents were almost twice as likely to correctly name a risk behaviour associated with schistosomiasis (baseline: 18.02%; endline: 30.11%; adjusted odds ratio: 1.91; 95% confidence interval: 1.14-2.58). Increases were also seen in the proportion of people who knew that schistosomiasis can be spread by infected persons and who could name at least one correct transmission route (baseline: 25.74%; endline: 32.20%; adjusted odds ratio: 1.36; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.84), those who knew that there is a drug that treats the disease (baseline: 29.20%, endline: 47.55%; adjusted odds ratio: 2.19; 95% confidence interval: 1.67-2.87) and those who stated that they actively protect themselves from the disease and cited an effective behaviour (baseline: 40.09%, endline: 59.30%; adjusted odds ratio: 2.14; 95% confidence interval: 1.40-3.28). The intervention did not appear to lead to a reduction in misconceptions. In particular, the belief that the disease is sexually transmitted continued to be widespread. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Given its overall positive impact on knowledge and behaviour at population level, Community Dialogue can play an important role in schistosomiasis prevention and control. The intervention could be further strengthened by better enabling communities to take suitable action and linking more closely with community governance structures and health system programmes.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAnthelminticsCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionFamily CharacteristicsHumansMass Drug AdministrationMozambiquePrevalenceRisk FactorsSchistosomiasisAnthelmintics

Identifiers

PMID30730881
PMCPMC6382216
OpenAlexW2911482120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.