Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30730874›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2019

Modeling Edar expression reveals the hidden dynamics of tooth signaling center patterning.

Alexa Sadier, Monika Twarogowska, Klara Steklikova, Luke Hayden, Anne Lambert, Pascal Schneider, Vincent Laudet, Maria Hovorakova, Vincent Calvez, Sophie Pantalacci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Six million years of vole dental evolution shaped by tooth development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Periodic pattern formation during embryonic development.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexa SadierLaboratoire de Biologie et Modélisation de la Cellule, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, INSERM U1210, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9907-3714
Monika TwarogowskaUnité de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, project team Inria NUMED, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5669, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7082-4377
Klara SteklikovaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Luke HaydenLaboratoire de Biologie et Modélisation de la Cellule, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, INSERM U1210, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1939-5714
Anne LambertInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, Lyon, France.
Pascal SchneiderDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Lausanne, CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0677-9409
Vincent LaudetInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, Lyon, France.
Maria HovorakovaInstitute of Experimental Medicine, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vincent CalvezInstitut Camille Jordan, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5208, Lyon, France.
Sophie PantalacciLaboratoire de Biologie et Modélisation de la Cellule, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, INSERM U1210, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0771-8985

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When patterns are set during embryogenesis, it is expected that they are straightly established rather than subsequently modified. The patterning of the three mouse molars is, however, far from straight, likely as a result of mouse evolutionary history. The first-formed tooth signaling centers, called MS and R2, disappear before driving tooth formation and are thought to be vestiges of the premolars found in mouse ancestors. Moreover, the mature signaling center of the first molar (M1) is formed from the fusion of two signaling centers (R2 and early M1). Here, we report that broad activation of Edar expression precedes its spatial restriction to tooth signaling centers. This reveals a hidden two-step patterning process for tooth signaling centers, which was modeled with a single activator-inhibitor pair subject to reaction-diffusion (RD). The study of Edar expression also unveiled successive phases of signaling center formation, erasing, recovering, and fusion. Our model, in which R2 signaling center is not intrinsically defective but erased by the broad activation preceding M1 signaling center formation, predicted the surprising rescue of R2 in Edar mutant mice, where activation is reduced. The importance of this R2-M1 interaction was confirmed by ex vivo cultures showing that R2 is capable of forming a tooth. Finally, by introducing chemotaxis as a secondary process to RD, we recapitulated in silico different conditions in which R2 and M1 centers fuse or not. In conclusion, pattern formation in the mouse molar field relies on basic mechanisms whose dynamics produce embryonic patterns that are plastic objects rather than fixed end points.

Indexed as

Body PatterningModels, BiologicalSignal TransductionAnimalsChemotaxisEdar ReceptorEpitheliumGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHairMiceMice, Mutant StrainsToothTooth GermEdar protein, mouseEdar Receptor

Identifiers

PMID30730874
PMCPMC6382175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.