Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30730541›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2019

Immune Response and Intraocular Inflammation in Patients With Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Treated With Intravitreal Injection of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus 2 Carrying the ND4 Gene: A Secondary Analysis of a Phase 1/2 Clinical Trial.

Céline Bouquet, Catherine Vignal Clermont, Anne Galy, Serge Fitoussi, Laure Blouin, Marion R Munk, Sonia Valero, Sandrine Meunier, Barrett Katz, José Alain Sahel and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Immune function in X-linked retinoschisis subjects in an AAV8-RS1 phase I/IIa gene therapy trial.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The curious case of AAV immunology.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ocular toxicity, distribution, and shedding of intravitreal AAV-eqIL-10 in horses.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Céline BouquetGenSight Biologics, Paris, France.
Catherine Vignal ClermontCentre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France.
Anne GalyGenSight Biologics, Paris, France.
Serge FitoussiGenSight Biologics, Paris, France.
Laure BlouinGenSight Biologics, Paris, France.
Marion R MunkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bern Photographic Reading Center, Bern, Switzerland.
Sonia ValeroGenSight Biologics, Paris, France.
Sandrine MeunierGenSight Biologics, Paris, France.
Barrett KatzGenSight Biologics, Paris, France.
José Alain SahelCentre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France.
Nitza ThomassonGenSight Biologics, Paris, France.
GenSight Biologics (France) · FRCentre hospitalier national d'ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts · FRFondation de Rothschild · FRUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Intravitreal gene therapy is regarded as generally safe with limited mild adverse events, but its systemic effects remain to be investigated. Objective: To examine the association between immune response and intraocular inflammation after ocular gene therapy with recombinant adeno-associated virus 2 carrying the ND4 gene (rAAV2/2-ND4). Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of an open-label, dose-escalation phase 1/2 randomized clinical trial of rAAV2/2-ND4 included data from February 13, 2014 (first patient visit), to March 30, 2017 (last patient visit at week 96), the first 2 years after injection. Patients older than 15 years with diagnosed ND4 Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and visual acuity of at least counting fingers were enrolled in 1 of 5 cohorts. Four dose cohorts of 3 patients each were treated sequentially. An extension cohort of 3 patients received the dose of 9 × 1010 viral genomes per eye. Interventions: Patients received increasing doses of rAAV2/2-ND4 (9 × 109, 3 × 1010, 9 × 1010, and 1.8 × 1011 viral genomes per eye) as a single unilateral intravitreal injection. Patients were monitored for 96 weeks after injection; ocular examinations were performed regularly, and blood samples were collected for immunologic testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: A composite ocular inflammation score (OIS) was calculated based on grades of anterior chamber cells and flare, vitreous cells, and haze according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature. The systemic immune response was quantified by enzyme-linked immunospot (cellular immune response), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IgG titers), and luciferase assay (neutralizing antibody [NAb] titers). Results: The present analysis included 15 patients (mean [SD] age, 47.9 [17.2] years; 13 men and 2 women) enrolled in the 5 cohorts of the clinical trial. Thirteen patients experienced intraocular inflammation after rAAV2/2-ND4 administration. Mild anterior chamber inflammation and vitritis were reported at all doses, and all cases were responsive to treatment. A maximum OIS of 9.5 was observed in a patient with history of idiopathic uveitis. Overall, OIS was not associated with the viral dose administered. No NAbs against AAV2 were detected in aqueous humor before treatment. Two patients tested positive for cellular immune response against AAV2 at baseline and after treatment. Humoral immune response was not apparently associated with the dose administered or with the immune status of patients at baseline. No association was found between OISs and serum NAb titers. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, intravitreal administration of rAAV2/2-ND4 in patients with LHON was safe and well tolerated. Further investigations may shed light into the local immune response to rAAV2/2-ND4 as a potential explanation for the observed intraocular inflammation.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityDependovirusElectroretinographyFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedNADH DehydrogenaseOptic Atrophy, Hereditary, LeberParvovirinaeNADH DehydrogenaseNADH dehydrogenase subunit 4Recombinant Fusion ProteinssFLT01 fusion protein

Identifiers

PMID30730541
PMCPMC6459107
OpenAlexW2914705959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.