Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30730298›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Cardiac Rehabilitees' Technology Experiences Before Remote Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study Using a Grounded Theory Approach.

Marjo-Riitta Anttila, Heikki Kivistö, Arja Piirainen, Katja Kokko, Anita Malinen, Mika Pekkonen, Tuulikki Sjögren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marjo-Riitta AnttilaFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6950-4261
Heikki KivistöFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3706-4038
Arja PiirainenFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4968-1276
Katja KokkoFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8747-2080
Anita MalinenFaculty of Education and Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3249-3087
Mika PekkonenPeurunka Rehabilitation, Laukaa, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5730-4417
Tuulikki SjögrenFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6908-4618

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven though technology is becoming increasingly common in rehabilitation programs, insufficient data are as yet available on rehabilitees' perceptions and experiences. It is important to understand their abilities when using technology for remote rehabilitation.

objectiveThis is a qualitative study on technology experiences of persons affected by cardiovascular disease assessed before remote rehabilitation. The aim of the study was to explore rehabilitees' experiences and attitudes toward technology before 12 months of remote rehabilitation.

methodsQualitative interviews were conducted with 39 rehabilitees in four focus groups. The subjects were aged 34 to 77 years (average age 54.8 years) and 74% (29/39) of them were male. They had been diagnosed with coronary artery disease and were undergoing treatment in a rehabilitation center. The interviews were conducted between September 2015 and November 2016. Data were analyzed using Glaser's mode of the grounded theory approach.

resultsThe result of the study was an "identifying e-usage" experience category, which refers to the rehabilitees' notions of the use of information and communication technologies (e-usage) in the process of behavior change. The main category comprises four subcategories that define the rehabilitees' technology experience. These subcategories are "feeling outsider," "being uninterested," "reflecting benefit," and "enthusiastic using." All rehabilitees expected that technology should be simple, flexible, and easy to use and learn. The results reflecting their technology experience can be used in e-rehabilitation programs. Rehabilitees who feel like outsiders and are not interested in technology need face-to-face communication for the major part of rehabilitation, while rehabilitees who reflect benefit and are enthusiastic about the use of technology need incrementally less face-to-face interaction and feel that Web-based coaching could offer sufficient support for rehabilitation.

conclusionsThe findings show that persons affected by heart disease had different experiences with technology and expectations toward counseling, while all rehabilitees expected technology to be easy to use and their experiences to be smooth and problem-free. The results can be used more widely in different contexts of social and health care for the planning of and training in remote rehabilitation counseling and education.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN61225589; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN61225589 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/74jmrTXFD).

Indexed as

Grounded TheoryCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchTelerehabilitationcoronary diseasee-healthe-rehabilitationfocus groupgrounded theoryqualitative studyrehabilitees’ experienceremote rehabilitationsecondary preventiontelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID30730298
PMCPMC6383114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.