Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30730297›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019

Applying Multivariate Segmentation Methods to Human Activity Recognition From Wearable Sensors' Data.

Kenan Li, Rima Habre, Huiyu Deng, Robert Urman, John Morrison, Frank D Gilliland, José Luis Ambite, Dimitris Stripelis, Yao-Yi Chiang, Yijun Lin and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Data Gathering Techniques in WSN: A Cross-Layer View.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kenan LiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4641-6699
Rima HabreDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2103-1706
Huiyu DengDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8239-2532
Robert UrmanDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2941-8964
John MorrisonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1478-9965
Frank D GillilandDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9033-7269
José Luis AmbiteInformation Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0087-080X
Dimitris StripelisInformation Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3343-8335
Yao-Yi ChiangSpatial Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8923-0130
Yijun LinSpatial Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0815-9636
Alex At BuiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4702-1373
Christine KingDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7646-1028
Anahita HosseiniDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4560-7394
Eleanne Van VlietDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5997-3040
Majid SarrafzadehDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8407-8689
Sandrah P EckelDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6050-7880
University of Southern California · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES007048 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Joseph Leo Wiemels · 1996 to 2026
$46.4M
The Los Angeles PRISMS Center: The Biomedical REAl-Time Health Evaluation (BREATHE) PlatformU54EB022002 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BUI, ALEX · 2015 to 2016
$6.1M
Pediatric Research using Integrated Sensor Monitoring Systems (PRISMS): Data and Software Coordination and Integration Center (DSCIC)U24EB021996 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI AMBITE, JOSE LUIS, ECKEL, SANDRAH PROCTOR · 2015 to 2015
$5.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB021996NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB022002NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTime-resolved quantification of physical activity can contribute to both personalized medicine and epidemiological research studies, for example, managing and identifying triggers of asthma exacerbations. A growing number of reportedly accurate machine learning algorithms for human activity recognition (HAR) have been developed using data from wearable devices (eg, smartwatch and smartphone). However, many HAR algorithms depend on fixed-size sampling windows that may poorly adapt to real-world conditions in which activity bouts are of unequal duration. A small sliding window can produce noisy predictions under stable conditions, whereas a large sliding window may miss brief bursts of intense activity.

objectiveWe aimed to create an HAR framework adapted to variable duration activity bouts by (1) detecting the change points of activity bouts in a multivariate time series and (2) predicting activity for each homogeneous window defined by these change points.

methodsWe applied standard fixed-width sliding windows (4-6 different sizes) or greedy Gaussian segmentation (GGS) to identify break points in filtered triaxial accelerometer and gyroscope data. After standard feature engineering, we applied an Xgboost model to predict physical activity within each window and then converted windowed predictions to instantaneous predictions to facilitate comparison across segmentation methods. We applied these methods in 2 datasets: the human activity recognition using smartphones (HARuS) dataset where a total of 30 adults performed activities of approximately equal duration (approximately 20 seconds each) while wearing a waist-worn smartphone, and the Biomedical REAl-Time Health Evaluation for Pediatric Asthma (BREATHE) dataset where a total of 14 children performed 6 activities for approximately 10 min each while wearing a smartwatch. To mimic a real-world scenario, we generated artificial unequal activity bout durations in the BREATHE data by randomly subdividing each activity bout into 10 segments and randomly concatenating the 60 activity bouts. Each dataset was divided into ~90% training and ~10% holdout testing.

resultsIn the HARuS data, GGS produced the least noisy predictions of 6 physical activities and had the second highest accuracy rate of 91.06% (the highest accuracy rate was 91.79% for the sliding window of size 0.8 second). In the BREATHE data, GGS again produced the least noisy predictions and had the highest accuracy rate of 79.4% of predictions for 6 physical activities.

conclusionsIn a scenario with variable duration activity bouts, GGS multivariate segmentation produced smart-sized windows with more stable predictions and a higher accuracy rate than traditional fixed-size sliding window approaches. Overall, accuracy was good in both datasets but, as expected, it was slightly lower in the more real-world study using wrist-worn smartwatches in children (BREATHE) than in the more tightly controlled study using waist-worn smartphones in adults (HARuS). We implemented GGS in an offline setting, but it could be adapted for real-time prediction with streaming data.

Indexed as

Recognition, PsychologyAccelerometryAdultFemaleHuman ActivitiesHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisTime FactorsWearable Electronic Devicesmachine learningphysical activitysmartphonestatistical data analysis wearable devices

Identifiers

PMID30730297
PMCPMC6386646
OpenAlexW2901081366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.