ReviewInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019
A review on lung boundary detection in chest X-rays.
Review in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 170 citations in OpenAlex.
- Classification of pulmonary disorders using pulmonary network with explainable AI framework from chest multi-modal images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Application of deep learning strategies in the standardization and diagnostic efficiency enhancement of chest X-ray imaging.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Enhancing the Generalizability of Deep Learning-Based Models for Lung Field Segmentation in Chest Radiographs Using Edge-Assisted Multiscale Feature Fusion.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- PLUTO: a YOLO-based lung field detector for pediatric lateral chest X-rays generalizable to adults.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- XTC-Net: an explainable hybrid model for automated atelectasis detection from chest radiographs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-view deep learning framework for the detection of chest X-rays compatible with pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Segmentation of lungs from chest X-ray images based on Deep Atrous Attention UNet (DAA-UNet) model.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- Lung Segmentation with Lightweight Convolutional Attention Residual U-Net.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Improving deep learning U-Net++ by discrete wavelet and attention gate mechanisms for effective pathological lung segmentation in chest X-ray imaging.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- An optimized transformer model for efficient detection of thoracic diseases in chest X-rays with multi-scale feature fusion.PloS one · 2025Article
- Tiny Lungs, Big Challenges: Pediatric and Premature Lung Segmentation using Deep Learning.... International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis. International SIPAIM Workshop · 2024Article
- Automated estimation of thoracic rotation in chest X-ray radiographs: a deep learning approach for enhanced technical assessment.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- A multicentre study to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a novel CAD software, DecXpert, for radiological diagnosis of tuberculosis in the northern Indian population.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Automated Quality Control Solution for Radiographic Imaging of Lung Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- COVID-19 Hierarchical Classification Using a Deep Learning Multi-Modal.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Advanced Diagnostics of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infants Treated with Surfactant and Budesonide through Computer-Assisted Chest X-ray Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Ensemble learning driven Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks-based Lung Cancer classification.PloS one · 2024Article
- Chitosan-Based Nanocarriers for Pulmonary and Intranasal Drug Delivery Systems: A Comprehensive Overview of their Applications.Current drug targets · 2024Review
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Data-driven classification and explainable-AI in the field of lung imaging.Frontiers in big data · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeChest radiography is the most common imaging modality for pulmonary diseases. Due to its wide usage, there is a rich literature addressing automated detection of cardiopulmonary diseases in digital chest X-rays (CXRs). One of the essential steps for automated analysis of CXRs is localizing the relevant region of interest, i.e., isolating lung region from other less relevant parts, for applying decision-making algorithms there. This article provides an overview of the recent literature on lung boundary detection in CXR images.
methodsWe review the leading lung segmentation algorithms proposed in period 2006-2017. First, we present a review of articles for posterior-anterior view CXRs. Then, we mention studies which operate on lateral views. We pay particular attention to works that focus their efforts on deformed lungs and pediatric cases. We also highlight the radiographic measures extracted from lung boundary and their use in automatically detecting cardiopulmonary abnormalities. Finally, we identify challenges in dataset curation and expert delineation process, and we listed publicly available CXR datasets.
results(1) We classified algorithms into four categories: rule-based, pixel classification-based, model-based, hybrid, and deep learning-based algorithms. Based on the reviewed articles, hybrid methods and deep learning-based methods surpass the algorithms in other classes and have segmentation performance as good as inter-observer performance. However, they require long training process and pose high computational complexity. (2) We found that most of the algorithms in the literature are evaluated on posterior-anterior view adult CXRs with a healthy lung anatomy appearance without considering challenges in abnormal CXRs. (3) We also found that there are limited studies for pediatric CXRs. The lung appearance in pediatrics, especially in infant cases, deviates from adult lung appearance due to the pediatric development stages. Moreover, pediatric CXRs are noisier than adult CXRs due to interference by other objects, such as someone holding the child's arms or the child's body, and irregular body pose. Therefore, lung boundary detection algorithms developed on adult CXRs may not perform accurately in pediatric cases and need additional constraints suitable for pediatric CXR imaging characteristics. (4) We have also stated that one of the main challenges in medical image analysis is accessing the suitable datasets. We listed benchmark CXR datasets for developing and evaluating the lung boundary algorithms. However, the number of CXR images with reference boundaries is limited due to the cumbersome but necessary process of expert boundary delineation.
conclusionsA reliable computer-aided diagnosis system would need to support a greater variety of lung and background appearance. To our knowledge, algorithms in the literature are evaluated on posterior-anterior view adult CXRs with a healthy lung anatomy appearance, without considering ambiguous lung silhouettes due to pathological deformities, anatomical alterations due to misaligned body positioning, patient's development stage and gross background noises such as holding hands, jewelry, patient's head and legs in CXR. Considering all the challenges which are not very well addressed in the literature, developing lung boundary detection algorithms that are robust to such interference remains a challenging task. We believe that a broad review of lung region detection algorithms would be useful for researchers working in the field of automated detection/diagnosis algorithms for lung/heart pathologies in CXRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.