Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30730008›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neurology2019

Five-year outcome in the copaxone observatory: a nationwide cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis starting treatment with glatiramer acetate in France.

Christine Lebrun-Frenay, Antoine Moulignier, Charles Pierrot-Deseilligny, Rabah Benrabah, Thibault Moreau, Catherine Lubetzki, Françoise Monchecourt, Copaxone Observatory

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Safety and Effectiveness of CinnomerArchives of Iranian medicine · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christine Lebrun-FrenayService de Neurologie, CRCSEP, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Université Nice Cote d'Azur, CS 51069, 30, voie Romaine, 06001, Nice Cedex 1, France. lebrun-frenay.c@chu-nice.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3713-2416
Antoine MoulignierFondation Ophtalmologique A. de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Charles Pierrot-DeseillignyDépartement de Neurologie, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Rabah BenrabahCentre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France.
Thibault MoreauService de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon-Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Catherine LubetzkiDépartement des Maladies du Système Nerveux, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Françoise MonchecourtTeva Santé, La Défense, France.
Copaxone Observatory

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The benefits provided by disease-modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis have been demonstrated in clinical trials, but the extent to which they can be extrapolated to everyday care is less clear, as are the long-term benefits of treatment. The objective of this prospective observational cohort study performed in France was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of glatiramer acetate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis over a 5-year period. All neurologists in France were invited to participate and enroll adult patients starting a first treatment with brand glatiramer acetate 20 mg. Given the observational nature of the study, no fixed study visits were imposed; consultations took place according to the investigator's normal practice. Occurrence of disease exacerbations and adverse events was documented and neurological disability evaluated with the EDSS at each consultation. Overall, 852 patients were analysable and 269 took glatiramer acetate continuously for 5 years. Median treatment duration was 3.4 years. Principal reasons for discontinuation were inadequate efficacy (38.9%), local tolerability (22.6%) and personal convenience (21.3%). Age, employment status, baseline EDSS score and number of previous exacerbations were variables associated with treatment persistence. The annualised exacerbation rate (5 years) was 0.41 [95% CI 0.39-0.44]; 316 patients (37.2%) remained exacerbation-free throughout. The risk of confirmed disability worsening (5 years) was 43.8% [95% CI 39.9-47.9%]. The most frequent adverse drug reactions were local injection site reactions (584 patients; 68.5%) and systemic immediate post-injection reactions (168 patients; 19.7%). Overall, these findings are consistent with those of previous clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdultDisability EvaluationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlatiramer AcetateHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMedication AdherenceMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeGlatiramer AcetateImmunosuppressive AgentsDisease-modifying treatmentFranceGlatiramer acetateObservational studyRelapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID30730008
PMCPMC6420902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.