Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30729363›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2020

Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of the Relief Nursery Program.

J Mark Eddy, Joann Wu Shortt, Charles R Martinez, Alice Holmes, Alice Wheeler, Jeff Gau, John Seeley, Jean Grossman

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Criminal Legal System Experiences Among Families Receiving Home Visiting Services: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Article
  6. Rigorous Research on Existing Child Maltreatment Prevention Programs: Introduction to the Special Section.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2020
    Article
  7. Balancing Rigor with Complexity in Understanding the Impacts of Child Maltreatment Prevention Programs.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J Mark EddyFamily Translational Research Group, Department of Cariology and Comprehensive Care, College of Dentistry, New York University, 137 E. 25th Street, New York, NY, 10010, USA. mark.eddy@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5847-3052
Joann Wu ShorttOregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, OR, USA.
Charles R MartinezCenter for Equity Promotion, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Alice HolmesOregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, OR, USA.
Alice WheelerOregon Social Learning Center, Eugene, OR, USA.
Jeff GauOregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR, USA.
John SeeleyOregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR, USA.
Jean GrossmanOffice of Population Research, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Funding

ACF HHS 90CA1781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An independent, randomized controlled trial of the community-developed, multiple-component Relief Nursery prevention program was conducted with families with young children considered "at risk" for child abuse and neglect. This established program, currently operating at multiple sites in the state of Oregon, comprises an integrated package of prevention services to children and families, including early childhood education, home visiting, and parent education and support, as well as other interventions tailored to the needs of each particular family. Families who contacted the Relief Nursery for the first time were randomly assigned to one of two conditions, the Full Program condition, whose members had access to all services available from the Relief Nursery, or the Respite Care condition, whose members had access only to respite care and referrals to services provided by other community agencies. A primary caregiver in each family was interviewed prior to intervention and then every 6 months across a period of 2 years. Standardized measures were collected on a variety of risk and protective factors related to child abuse and neglect. Analyses were conducted at the end of the study period. Differences were found between the conditions in terms of perceived helpfulness and satisfaction with services and in terms of social support, in each case favoring the Full Program condition. Implications of the findings for future studies of multicomponent child abuse prevention programs with similar characteristics to the Relief Nursery are discussed.

Indexed as

House CallsOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdultChild AbuseChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleOregonParentingParentsProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesChild abuse and neglectCrisis nurseryEarly childhood educationHome visitingParentingRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.