Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30729268›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Field dependence-independence differently affects retrospective time estimation and flicker-induced time dilation.

Alice Teghil, Maddalena Boccia, Cecilia Guariglia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Time Production Intensively Studied in One Observer.Journal for person-oriented research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alice TeghilDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78, 00185, Rome, Italy. alice.teghil@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3689-3376
Maddalena BocciaCognitive and Motor Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, via Ardeatina 306, 00179, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2044-8326
Cecilia GuarigliaDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, via dei Marsi 78, 00185, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7474-6030

Funding

Sapienza Università di Roma AR11816421D63BF2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Field dependence-independence (FDI) is a stable dimension of individual functioning, transversal to different cognitive domains. While the role of some individual variables in time perception has received considerable attention, it is not clear whether and how FDI influences timing abilities. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that FDI differently affects timing performance depending on whether the task requires cognitive restructuring. Participants were assessed for FDI using the embedded figures test (EFT). They performed a prospective timing task, reproducing the duration of a flickering stimulus, and a retrospective timing task, estimating the duration of the task. We expected performance of field-dependent (FD) and field-independent (FI) individuals not to differ in the prospective task, since restructuring of task material is not needed to reproduce the stimulus duration. Conversely, we predicted that FI individuals should be more accurate than FD ones in the retrospective condition, involving restructuring skills. Results show that while both FD and FI individuals under-reproduced the stimulus duration in the prospective task, only FD participants significantly underestimated the duration of the timing task in the retrospective condition. These results suggest that differences across FD and FI individuals are apparent in timing only when the task requires high-level cognitive processing; conversely, these differences do not affect basic sensory processing.

Indexed as

Field Dependence-IndependenceAdultFemaleHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualPsychomotor PerformanceThinkingTime PerceptionYoung AdultCognitive styleField dependenceInterval reproductionRetrospective time estimationTime perceptionTiming

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.