Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30729231›Full record

ReviewUltrasound international open2019

EFSUMB Recommendations for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Part 3: Endorectal, Endoanal and Perineal Ultrasound.

Dieter Nuernberg, Adrian Saftoiu, Ana Paula Barreiros, Eike Burmester, Elena Tatiana Ivan, Dirk-André Clevert, Christoph F Dietrich, Odd Helge Gilja, Torben Lorentzen, Giovanni Maconi and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ultrasound international open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04927897 (DETECT), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04927897 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

DETECT: Defining the Target Volume for Endoluminal Radiation Boosting in Patients With Rectal Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorMaastricht Radiation OncologyRan2022 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsRectal CancerArmsUltrasound, Rectoscopy, Scan, e.g. CT (resection specimen)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Imaging in chronic inflammatory bowel disease].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Perianal Fistula; from Etiology to Treatment - A Review.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Basic practices for gastrointestinal ultrasound.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.

Dieter NuernbergMedical School Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Gastroenterology, Neuruppin, Germany.
Adrian SaftoiuResearch Center in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Ana Paula BarreirosDeutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation, Head of Organisation Center Middle, Frankfurt, Germany.
Eike BurmesterDepartment of Internal Medicine/Gastroenterology, Sana-Kliniken Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Elena Tatiana IvanResearch Center in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Dirk-André ClevertDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center, University of Munich-Grosshadern Campus, Munich, Germany.
Christoph F DietrichCaritas-Krankenhaus, Medizinische Klinik 2, Bad Mergentheim, Germany.
Odd Helge GiljaNational Centre for Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Torben LorentzenUltrasound Section, Division of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Giovanni MaconiGastroenterology Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, "L.Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Ismail MihmanliIstanbul University - Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Radiology and ALKA Radyoloji Tani Merkezi, Istanbul, Turkey.
Christian Pallson NolsoeUltrasound Section, Division of Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital and Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frank PfefferDepartment of Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Søren Rafael RafaelsenColorectal Centre of Excellence, Clinical Cancer Centre, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Zeno Sparchez3rd Medical Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Peter VilmannEndoscopy Department, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev, Denmark.
Jo Erling Riise WaageDepartment of Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova · ROCaritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim · DEGerman Organ Transplantation Foundation · DEHerlev Hospital · DKIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TRIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELuigi Sacco Hospital · ITMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DERegion of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article represents part 3 of the EFSUMB Recommendations and Guidelines for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound (GIUS). It provides an overview of the examination techniques recommended by experts in the field of endorectal/endoanal ultrasound (ERUS/EAUS), as well as perineal ultrasound (PNUS). The most important indications are rectal tumors and inflammatory diseases like fistula and abscesses in patients with or without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PNUS sometimes is more flexible and convenient compared to ERUS. However, the technique of ERUS is quite well established, especially for the staging of rectal cancer. EAUS also gained ground in the evaluation of perianal diseases like fistulas, abscesses and incontinence. For the staging of perirectal tumors, the use of PNUS in addition to conventional ERUS could be recommended. For the staging of anal carcinomas, PNUS can be a good option because of the higher resolution. Both ERUS and PNUS are considered excellent guidance methods for invasive interventions, such as the drainage of fluids or targeted biopsy of tissue lesions. For abscess detection and evaluation, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) also helps in therapy planning.

Indexed as

endoanal ultrasoundendorectal ultrasoundperineal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID30729231
PMCPMC6363590
OpenAlexW2914921033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.