Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30729158›Full record

ArticleScience advances2019

Weak magnetic fields alter stem cell-mediated growth.

Alanna V Van Huizen, Jacob M Morton, Luke J Kinsey, Donald G Von Kannon, Marwa A Saad, Taylor R Birkholz, Jordan M Czajka, Julian Cyrus, Frank S Barnes, Wendy S Beane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantum Effects in Evolution: Terrestrial Fine-Tuning of Magnetic Parameters.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cellular and Molecular Effects of Magnetic Fields.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alanna V Van HuizenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1261-3819
Jacob M MortonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA.
Luke J KinseyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA.
Donald G Von KannonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA.
Marwa A SaadDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA.
Taylor R BirkholzDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6523-5148
Jordan M CzajkaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1145-0464
Julian CyrusDepartment of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5444-1926
Frank S BarnesDepartment of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Wendy S BeaneDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3762-1025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological systems are constantly exposed to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) in the form of natural geomagnetic fields and EMFs emitted from technology. While strong magnetic fields are known to change chemical reaction rates and free radical concentrations, the debate remains about whether static weak magnetic fields (WMFs; <1 mT) also produce biological effects. Using the planarian regeneration model, we show that WMFs altered stem cell proliferation and subsequent differentiation via changes in reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and downstream heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) expression. These data reveal that on the basis of field strength, WMF exposure can increase or decrease new tissue formation in vivo, suggesting WMFs as a potential therapeutic tool to manipulate mitotic activity.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationElectromagnetic FieldsAnimalsCell DifferentiationFree RadicalsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsMitosisPlanariansReactive Oxygen SpeciesRegenerationRNA InterferenceStem CellsFree RadicalsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID30729158
PMCPMC6353618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.